You said carry 400 rounds, you said nothing of having 400 rounds on the weapon…(And ill take the spell check as an admission of you being wrong) Thx 
I’m not wrong, you’d have to have a magazine large enough for those 400rds which would have to be attached to the firearm and then you’d need a liquid nitrogen spray to keep it cool enough to run.
You have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about here.
Ok…if you say so. …lol
Learn something.
Actually no…they can be belt fed. So there’s that.
There are no belt fed AR’s that can handle 400 rounds of sustained fire. There are no AR’s period that can do that.
Umm I know weapons can melt down…changed out my share of M2 barrels.
Then you know the BS you are peddling is BS.
But it took three years … 
Semi fire is more accurate. Machine guns are for suppression.
2 Likes
If your goal is to kill a lot of people, 40 rounds per minute is more effective than 400.
2 Likes
30 round magazine? You bet.
What type of M16 fires 800 rounds a minute?
All of them…
And before anyone says its wikipedia all other sites have same specs
Another
https://modernfirearms.net/en/assault-rifles/u-s-a-assault-rifles/m16-a1-a2-a3-a4-eng/
by a single function of the trigger.
Bump stock doesn’t do that.
It’s not “sustained for a minute”.
Why on earth would you do that?
When someone is reduced to being a spelling/ grammar cop, that means they’ve lost the argument.
No it doesn’t. It means you made a grammatical error. You don’t get to spell “hamster” with a “p”.
What a strange, gen z thing to say.
1 Like
