The illegal invader who was released after assaulting a police officer was arrested again on theft charges. That’s three crimes that we know of. At the same time, a J6 rioter who assaulted a police officer gets 20 years in prison. Antifa goons who asault cops typically get nothing. Libs, please explain why your party is opposed to putting the invader in prison or simply doing the obvious and deporting him?
The governors of Nevada and Virginia have just completed purging their voter rolls of ineligible voters. Why are liberals opposed to this and why shouldn’t every state do it?
Purging the voter rolls of “ineligible voters” sounds great as long as it’s only for ineligible voters, but it comes off as a nefarious effort to get rid of eligible voters too and let them deal with it.
David Dempsey deserves every one of his 20 years. He didn’t assault a police officer. He brutally beat multiple police officers over the course of the siege. There is video of all of it. Proven guilty multiple times over by a jury of his peers.
You totally ignored both of my questions. I even put them in BOLD to make it easy.
Please explain why your party is opposed to putting the invader in prison or simply doing the obvious and deporting him?
The governors of Nevada and Virginia have just completed purging their voter rolls of ineligible voters. Why are liberals opposed to this and why shouldn’t every state do it?
And it also comes off as liberals wanting to keep ineligible voters on the rolls for nefarious reasons. Accidentally removing some felons seens like something that’s fixable. The Nevada model is a pretty good one. Right?