I think it’s weirder to think he’s going to allow lies to be propagated on a sponsor based site.

But I was wrong about him putting up the cash, so who knows? Maybe it will be a free for all over there.

Why would he ban obscenity but not lies? How is one more worthy of ‘free speech’ than the other?

Isn’t the deal at 53? It won’t go below 51.75 or so unless there is bad news about the deal.

But what do I know? Been wrong about this whole thing so far.

A very short time ago, it was below $40 so there are plenty that as they’re dumping, are also making money.

So you don’t think twitter should have allowed posts about Russian collusion? Or allow men to claim they are women?

4 Likes

They locked down twitter to keep the disgruntled employees from sabotaging it. :rofl:

3 Likes

MSNBC is now discovering that Twitter could be used to rig elections:

4 Likes

Oh they already knew, but now they aren’t the ones in the position to do it.

3 Likes

As they should. We’ve all seen how dangerous and malignant angry libs get.

I’m surprised they haven’t attacked any old men in wheelchairs yet. :rofl:

2 Likes

Geewhiz, it’s as if those of us with functioning brains already knew this. :wink:

2 Likes

Oooooooooohhhhhh…so NOW…it’s…different? Well at least that’s consistent. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

…and if Musk were to cut a check for over $400 million to effect an election like Zuckerberg did, would that then be a problem with libs too?

3 Likes

Why else do you think they’re so bitter and hateful over this? :wink:

3 Likes

Will Facebook ban MSNBC for spreading “election misinformation”?

#leavingtwitter :rofl::+1::rofl::+1:

4 Likes

–Jack Dorsey, Twitt Founder

They’re off to make their own site. :rofl:

4 Likes

Glitter.

4 Likes

image

5 Likes

image

5 Likes

Yeah, but arbitragers will scoop it up pretty close to the selling price.

Why would he ban obscenity but not lies? How is one more worthy of ‘free speech’ than the other?