It’s dumbed down when he’s on it.
It’s more like a Chuck E. Cheese when he’s on it.
If other countries are doing we can’t possibly do that in the US because “it won’t work here” or sumpting.
It’s as if there’s never been a plane that’s been 100% under human control that has ever crashed. Nope, humans are infallable.
A Roomba could write better posts than some I’ve read on this forum.
4 Likes
JayJay
91
Well yeah…like I said, AI has been proven in the natiral language processing field.
Apparently, part of the reason the software fix is still not implemented is that work on it was impacted by the 35-day government shutdown.
Some more excellent Trump insights on aeronautical technology right here:
you are absolutely right. My daughters boyfriend is studying to be a pilot at University of North Dakota Flight school. He said they are learning about this in real time. Because of the two engines more forward of the wing instead of under the wing design, the plane pitches up on rotation and in climb, the computer sensors then over ride the pilot and pitch the plane back down to a more level climb rate. What happens in these crashes they think is that the pilot then tries to over ride the computer and the plane then doesn’t fly. However, American pilots I think like everything else, be it aviation or medicine are so much better trained for things like this, that they let the plane fly itself, instead of trying to override the computer.
It will be interesting to see what the NTSB reports on this is. But the problem as he tells it is in itself the forward of the wing design of the plane it’s self.
Their workhorse is the 737 800 and the 700. It operates 512 737-700s and 202 737-800s. They currently only have 16 Max 8s in services at this time.
That’s what I’ve read too. The engines are further forward which meant they had to even change the point where the wings attach to the fuselage.
Either way seems half assed on Boeing’s part.
And Boeing is very good about design and not having design flaws. I did extensive research on the DC 10 after the chicago accident in 78. What a disaster that thing was. They cut corners, were lazy with redundancies, That plane might have been able to fly after the engine fell off, if it hadn’t severed all the hydrolic lines, main and backup…because they all ran through the same part of the wing, as opposed to back ups being run through another part. They might have been able to control it better. And that was just one design flaw.
I know but I wanted to be sure since two flights are long flights where they could use a newer and bigger plane.
I’m flying 700 series going and 800 series returning but not a Max.
Demon
99
He was probably on the cockpit phone directing it.
LouC
100
Obese Donald Trump, LEADING FROM BEHIND on airline safety for the air travelers of America and the world!
I guess perhaps someone got to Obese Donald Trump and explained to him that “yes” modern flying is far more complex than in the days of Orville and Wilbur, but that crashing hasn’t changed a bit.
They land it with the lights off!
1 Like
All that being said - it is remarkable just how safe flying is compared to the complexity of today’s modern aircraft.
1 Like
LouC
103
That is because nobody’s home.
1 Like
The FAA was never shut down.
