216

And if serious Federal crimes are revealed as the result, then what?

217

So, you agree if there is no court ruling then this raid is an abuse of power?

.

218

Don’t forget some of those (D)irty children! :rofl:

1 Like
219

He is not the President anymore.

221

“He’s being unfairly persecuted”

-conservatives on Aug 9, 1974

2 Likes
222

serious federal crimes? in a dispute over documents?

good luck with that

4 Likes
224

That’s not an answer.

225

And if serious Federal crimes are revealed as the result, then what?

It’s very revealing that no one will answer the question.

226

:rofl:

And to think, you guys have been raging impotently about locking Hillary Clinton up for unintentional spillage for nearly a decade now.

1 Like
227

He will be again and the Democrats will PAY for their treason.

228

Still no answer too the question.

If serious Federal crimes are revealed as the result, then what?

229

Those are just the average creepy wannabe stalkers. :wink:

image
image882×552 48.6 KB

5 Likes
230

Already covered this, he was when he took them if he did.

231

how do you unintentionally destroy phones with hammers?

3 Likes
232

There was a mouse walking in between them?

234

Nixon v. Administrator of General Services.

235

Have you thought about what it would take to have a judge sign off on this warrant?

How many times has a President or former had their home/business raided?

236

i did answer, there won’t be any. its a dispute over documents that the current admin decided to go all heavy handed stazi over instead of handling it with lawyers.

2 Likes
237

All legal moments are technically legal moments, do I need to explain law to you?

2 Likes
239

was cnn already there when the fbi showed up?

3 Likes