I saw several different clips today with democrat talking heads calling the embassy attack “Trump’s Benghazi”.
Do they really want to make that comparison? Really?
Let’s start with a few facts.
Like Benghazi they had forewarning that an attack might be coming.
Unlike Benghazi they removed the Ambassador and diplomatic staff long before the attack began.
Like Benghazi, the attackers penetrated the outer wall defended by the locals.
Unlike Benghazi not a single US national was killed and they didn’t penetrate into the embassy buildings.
Unlike Benghazi US forces were immediately mobilized and moved in to secure the embassy compound and additional forces from the 82nd immediately moved in to reinforce them.
Do the dem’s and their cohorts in the media really want to go there?
The facility in Benghazi was not even up to the standards that existed at the time. It could only be kept open on orders of Hillary and Obama as a result.
The standards were set by the commission after the series of attacks during the Clinton administration.
I love the liberal press…in that…they don’t even try to hide their blatant partisanship anymore. Does anybody consider them a fair and balanced, neutral source of actual news? Anybody?
Not being able to back up ones assertions is a sure sign of having nothing. It should be extrememly simple to at least give a name that proves these statements were made. A google search shows that The Five used the term this morning but that’s all that comes up
