Ask bush…nothing to do with Obama
Can you provide a source that backs this up? Like @BlueTex I’m under the impression it was 1950.
In the wake of the 1950 Census, the Census Bureau rejected this older paradigm of census practice in favor of a radically different model.
It last appeared in the long form census in 2000. Obama removed the long form census in 2010 and it didn’t appear in any form.
So again, why was it removed in the first place?
for example, look at questions 13a through 16
here is the 2000 long form census form that a percentage filled out.
See questions 12, 13, 14.
You must be pretty mad at Bush then
Obama didn’t do that.
there was no long form in 2010. Who decided not to do a long form?
Oh snap! Why can’t we blame Obama? We want to blame Obama…
…anonymous trump supporter stomps off in disillusionment.
You are wrong here. This was bush…
there was no long form in 2010. Who decided not to do a long form?
The Bush census bureau…
Here is their legal justification…
Add Ross to the list: Top Trump Departures
Flynn
Walsh
Comey
Dubke
McFarland
Spicer
Priebus
Mooch
Bannon
Gorka
Icahn
Price
Powell
Manigault
McCabe
Porter
Raffel
Hicks
Cohn
Tillerson
McMaster
Shulkin
Anton
Bossert
Pruitt
Short
Haley
Sessions
Kelly
Ayers
Zinke
Mattis
Shine
McMahon
Nielsen
Sanders
Acosta
Snow96:there was no long form in 2010. Who decided not to do a long form?
The Bush census bureau…
Here is the their legal justification…
Those damn facts.
there was no long form in 2010. Who decided not to do a long form?
The Census Bureau first proposed it in 1995…then it was put into place in 2005 with the first ACS, the replacement to the Long Form.
Which has a ridiculously low sample size.
It is an easy and apt question to ask. Opposition to this is full of bad intentions for our national construct.
The ACS is given every year, not every ten.
That ends up surveying a larger percentage of people, not a smaller percentage, than a long form census given every ten years.
Nonsense. How do you scare someone who has left persecution with a question?
These arguments don’t even make sense.
Twisted logic there. Cumulative sampling does not make up for a small sample pool.
Newsflash. There are a lot of globalists that despise the ACS too.
This is cruel to the people that feel they need to lie and horribly unfair to the people who follow the legal path and the law.
Lose Lose Lose.
Nobody is being done any favor.
It is ridiculous that this question is not part of the census.
Rejected because the justification did not pass judicial review?
Pretty bad performance IMO.
My man Roberts says it was a contrived reason and so it is.
Tough noogies.
Allan
Absolutely cumulative sampling does add up.
The data doesn’t go away.
And the annual sample size itself is not that small, statistically speaking.
He’s got more of a turnover than McDonalds.