WuWei
3148
You vanished. And came back with a muzzle on.
Yes: The sensational “hush-money” framing from our terrible media obscures what the trial was about. Credit the the Post for doing a little better re: illegal election influence.
Piper
3150
Did they lock her up? No, they stopped the investigations.
1 Like
No. You’d have more of a point if it was just Cohen’s word. It wasn’t. The prosecutors were scrupulous in corroborating their case with meeting-logs, signed checks, recordings, as well as supporting testimony from people like David Pecker. To say “with no corroboration” at this point suggests willful ignorance. It’s just objectively wrong.
3 Likes
DougBH
3154
Being threatened with being locked up due to being an extortion victim, based on a political motive, goes beyond playing.
DougBH
3155
None of the actual supposedly criminal acts, such as misrepresenting the accounts for tax purposes, were ever corroborated. You have Trump at some meeting and this is supposed to corroborate Cohen’s fantasies. They do not.
DougBH
3156
Paying an extortionist is a scheme to,illegally influence the 2016 election. I suppose Democrats eat up,this nonsense. Well, this forum says yes, they do.
1 Like

Apparently the jury disagrees with you, as they seem to have credited Cohen’s testimony.
This is our politics now. Once one party crosses a line, you can guarantee the other party will cross it even further.
The jury disagreed.
It is baffling to me that you’re still making credibility arguments - that ship sailed as soon as the jury came back with a verdict.
1 Like
You are welcome your opinion, but that ship has sailed.
The jury clearly believed Cohen’s testimony. They’re the only ones who get a say, and they already decided.
Well, I’d say one needs to be in prison first before claiming to be a prisoner, no ?
Also, has he maybe threatened to “lock up” anyone before ? Like eight years ago or so ?
Not just signed checks…signed checks with his signature signed in the oval office…
1 Like
What crime was concealed?
Nope biden showers with his young daughter. Which is perfectly fine with democrats.
Which is worse in your mind consensual sex with an adult or a father forcing his young daughter to shower with him?
1 Like
utter nonsense. Why you making stuff up?
Dont forget it is consensual sex with an adult other than your wife who is at home with your newborn son. You conveniently left that out. 

.
Though showering with your kids is creepy as ■■■■ and certainly is questionable. No doubt about that.
But I walk around at home in just my undercrackers and if my adult kids come round dont expect me to change. Drives my wife bananas.