Trump Threatens to Sue CNN Over Bias in Reporting

FloridaYankee · 2019-10-19T19:30:23.088Z

NuffSaid:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466473-trump-campaign-threatens-to-sue-cnn-citing-project-veritas-videos

President Trump’s legal team sent a letter to CNN, threatening to sue because of overt bias and negative reporting of the President.

I, for one, am all for 1st Amendment. People wanna be high-profile, then they need to accept that there will be negative press about them. It doesn’t matter the percentage of good press versus bad press.

Thoughts?

A news network has no obligation to be non bias. How on Earth could Fox News exist otherwise. This is one of the stupidest things the stupidest president we’ve ever had has ever said.

18576 · 2019-10-19T19:31:55.536Z

How many times has this boob threatened to sue someone and then does nothing. Biggest. Wind bag. Ever.

FloridaYankee · 2019-10-19T19:38:41.167Z

DougBH:

A ridiculous letter clearly done for political rather than legal purposes.

A letter from the president of the United States threatening to krap all over the first amendment. His ■■■■■■■ JOB ONE is to defend the constitution!

But somehow this is not problematic. Biting my tongue because maybe I don’t want to be banned from this place.

Yet.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-10-20T03:49:49.800Z

Wow. I didn’t realise the first amendment legalised fraud, on the basis that you are free to say anything at all. I thought it meant you are free to say anything, but you could be held accountable for telling lies.

Kelby · 2019-10-20T03:59:53.708Z

Paul_Thomson:

Wow. I didn’t realise the first amendment legalised fraud, on the basis that you are free to say anything at all. I thought it meant you are free to say anything, but you could be held accountable for telling lies.

Lol, if that were the case Trump would rot in jail.

There is no such clause.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-10-20T04:59:59.492Z

Kelby:

Lol, if that were the case Trump would rot in jail.

There is no such clause.

So, you seem to be saying that fraud is legal because the first amendment doesn’t say anything about legal consequences for dishonestly using free speech.

Forcefield · 2019-10-20T05:04:11.635Z

18576:

How many times has this boob threatened to sue someone and then does nothing. Biggest. Wind bag. Ever.

Oh he has followed through. Like when he tried to sue Bill Maher for insinuating that his father was an ape. He lost.

Forcefield · 2019-10-20T05:06:09.691Z

Paul_Thomson:

So, you seem to be saying that fraud is legal because the first amendment doesn’t say anything about legal consequences for dishonestly using free speech.

Nope. Bring on the suit. It means CNN has free reign to prove they were right, which means I don’t think you would enjoy the suit.

SeaManatee · 2019-10-20T05:06:35.745Z

So you’re saying Bill Maher got away with fraud. And you’re okay with that?

Forcefield · 2019-10-20T05:09:50.156Z

SeaManatee:

So you’re saying Bill Maher got away with fraud. And you’re okay with that?

Hahaha.

hwyflier · 2019-10-20T05:11:22.798Z

Bill Maher got away with comedy, protected by the 1st amendment.

SeaManatee · 2019-10-20T05:15:36.533Z

I liked his recent end segment trying to raise money to bribe Trump to just leave office.

hwyflier · 2019-10-20T05:17:10.466Z

He doesn’t need to pony anything up. Here’s my deal:

Resign tomorrow and Pence will pardon everyone. Keep your ill-gotten gains and your twitter account and leave. Fake a heart attack, blame the libs, whatever. Just go.

Win win win.

FloridaYankee · 2019-10-20T06:43:47.099Z

Paul_Thomson:

Kelby:

Lol, if that were the case Trump would rot in jail.

There is no such clause.

So, you seem to be saying that fraud is legal because the first amendment doesn’t say anything about legal consequences for dishonestly using free speech.

He accused them of BIAS. Where do you get this fraud ■■■■■ Just stop.

westaussie · 2019-10-20T07:11:35.003Z

It is quite novel to argue about the consequences of lying and contemporaneously defending Trump.

NuffSaid · 2019-10-20T10:44:55.034Z

Paul_Thomson:

Wow. I didn’t realise the first amendment legalised fraud, on the basis that you are free to say anything at all. I thought it meant you are free to say anything, but you could be held accountable for telling lies.

Trump said his father was born in Germany. I guess he committed fraud. Did any of the Loyalists call him out on it? Hold him accountable?

Nah, they made pathetic excuses and chanted “Send her back!”

Kelby · 2019-10-20T12:54:40.307Z

FloridaYankee:

NuffSaid:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466473-trump-campaign-threatens-to-sue-cnn-citing-project-veritas-videos

President Trump’s legal team sent a letter to CNN, threatening to sue because of overt bias and negative reporting of the President.

I, for one, am all for 1st Amendment. People wanna be high-profile, then they need to accept that there will be negative press about them. It doesn’t matter the percentage of good press versus bad press.

Thoughts?

A news network has no obligation to be non bias. How on Earth could Fox News exist otherwise. This is one of the stupidest things the stupidest president we’ve ever had has ever said.

And that’s saying something.

FloridaYankee · 2019-10-20T13:19:18.902Z

Kelby:

FloridaYankee:

NuffSaid:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466473-trump-campaign-threatens-to-sue-cnn-citing-project-veritas-videos

President Trump’s legal team sent a letter to CNN, threatening to sue because of overt bias and negative reporting of the President.

I, for one, am all for 1st Amendment. People wanna be high-profile, then they need to accept that there will be negative press about them. It doesn’t matter the percentage of good press versus bad press.

Thoughts?

A news network has no obligation to be non bias. How on Earth could Fox News exist otherwise. This is one of the stupidest things the stupidest president we’ve ever had has ever said.

And that’s saying something.

It surely is!

SimplyTrying · 2019-10-20T13:34:20.011Z

DougBH:

TheDoctorIsIn:

That’s a cop out if I ever heard one.

I understand, you didn’t think your statement through, and now you’re stuck dealing with the obvious conclusion for which you have no answer.

?
You have a very active imagination.

If the imagination is not active, wouldn’t that be the same as being brain dead?

biggestal99 · 2019-10-20T15:38:06.321Z

madasheck:

I disagree that the Mueller Report completely absolved the president

His campaign had multiple persons who had meetings with Russia.

It’s funny how that is completely dismissed by trump supporters.

Allan