This could have started an all out war if things had gone wrong. Had it done so and the stated reason for the strike was revealed to be essentially made up, how would that have played out?
The first attack that killed an American was the beginning of a growing threat to the United States. Trump took it a notch higher and attacked a terrorist group with in Iraq that had Iranian ties…as retaliation. This terrorist group then took to storming the US embassy and would have destroyed it and all inside, if they were given enough time? Trump then took it even higher and killed the number 2 man in Iran. At this point, the terrorists have another choice…continue the escalation or…understand that it’s a no win situation and stop. They chose to make a fake attack to save face but in reality…they chose to stop. Had Trump not retaliated so decisively…does anyone actually believe Iran wouldn’t have continued to escalate their terrorist agenda? Trump fought their violence with even more severe violence and that…they fully understood.
12-15 “Christmas Gift” promised by north korea
12-18 Impeachment
12-27 U.S. contractor killed in rocket attacks in Kirkuk.
12-31 iranian backed protestors storm embassy is baghdad
12-31 north korea threatens to resume nuke testing
Deflection. Those two clowns have nothing to do with the topic at hand: which is whether we hold the Presidency to a standard of providing coherent and credible explanations of their policies.
Yes it was my post and nowhere in my post was there any discussion fo the two people you chose to put front and center. That’s a deflection and that’s why I called it such.