Not when they are acting as government proxies.
GrandWazoo: zantax:Glad I could help.
This has nothing to do with First Amendment rights. It’s about the use of social media platforms. And what Trump doesn’t seem to get is that it is their sandbox and therefore their rules.
Not when they are acting as government proxies.
Strong whiff of socialism just blew through. I thought conservatives were against that? I guess not when it helps their fallen leader.
It is a class action suit against Dosey and Zuckerberg. Dershowitz is part of the team. Wuhan Lab origin will be the thrust of the evidentiary.
Dershowitz: Trump’s Big Tech Lawsuit ‘Will Shake Things Up Considerably’ Dershowitz: Trump's Big Tech Lawsuit 'Will Shake Things Up Considerably'
Jezcoe: zantax: Jezcoe: zantax: Jezcoe:You have a right to free speech.
You don’t have a right to use someone else’s private platform to do it.
Government is not permitted to infringe upon speech, using proxies to do it, not allowed. He needs to switch targets.
People can say what they want and the “proxies” are allowed to act how they want.
This isn’t a 1st amendment issue since a private platform is under no obligation to provide a service for free.
And I gave you a lengthy paper that explains proxy censorship and everything. Apparently you didn’t read it.
Nope. In a low internet environment in the woods.
I still find it funny that you are against net neutrality which is consumer protections for something that people pay money for but want to nationalize private internet platforms that are free to use.
They aren’t free, you haven’t figured that out yet?
I have never paid a dime to any of those companies.
Just an ambulance chaser with an aol email.
zantax: Jezcoe: zantax: Jezcoe: zantax: Jezcoe:You have a right to free speech.
You don’t have a right to use someone else’s private platform to do it.
Government is not permitted to infringe upon speech, using proxies to do it, not allowed. He needs to switch targets.
People can say what they want and the “proxies” are allowed to act how they want.
This isn’t a 1st amendment issue since a private platform is under no obligation to provide a service for free.
And I gave you a lengthy paper that explains proxy censorship and everything. Apparently you didn’t read it.
Nope. In a low internet environment in the woods.
I still find it funny that you are against net neutrality which is consumer protections for something that people pay money for but want to nationalize private internet platforms that are free to use.
They aren’t free, you haven’t figured that out yet?
I have never paid a dime to any of those companies.
You just gave them your data for free.Your data has monetary value, that’s why they want it. I though everyone had that figured out by now.
You just gave them your data for free.Your data has monetary value, that’s why they want it.
Still… I have never given them a dime.
You?
You click to accept their terms and conditions so you agree to abide by their rules.
The rules are changing.
Too big to manage as non utility.
Dershowitz…1st amendment vs 1st amendment showdown.
Your Tweets are awesome.
Wuhan Lab origin will be the thrust of the evidentiary.
Wut?
Dershowitz: Trump’s Big Tech Lawsuit ‘Will Shake Things Up Considerably’ Dershowitz: Trump’s Big Tech Lawsuit ‘Will Shake Things Up Considerably’
“They have special exemption under Section 230, and therefore they partake of some kind of government action, and the courts will have to parse this issue. How much of what they do is private? How much of what they do partakes of being public?”
This is argyle-bargle. Meaningless.
Dershowitz…1st amendment vs 1st amendment showdown.
Dershowitz isn’t going to be involved in this case.
The case is more complicated than people realize.
The right to censor as a 1st amendment right is an opening for the shadow banned.
The case is more complicated than people realize.
It really isn’t.
The right to censor as a 1st amendment right is an opening for the shadow banned.
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
He filed a brief and says so in the link.
He was just on TV hawking his book on the same subject.
The timing is ripe.
Doesn’t matter.
The case is more complicated than people realize.
The right to censor as a 1st amendment right is an opening for the shadow banned.
A couple of his lawyers are personal injury lawyers and they put a totally nonexistent law in their lawsuit documents.
So no…it’s less complicated than people realize.
But you bought it…
He filed a brief and says so in the link.
No, it doesn’t. He claims that he was asked to be an expert witness, and filed an affidavit.
But this case is never going to go to trial.
Maybe. The Wuhan Lab leak lie and actions by Dorsey and Zuckerberg opened the door. Clearly they over reacted to the lab leak data at first.