No one should watch this by the way. The only way to make Trump suffer is to hit him in the ratings. He’d happily sacrifice his family’s lives if he felt it would be good for ratings…
If he takes a bi-partisan approach most listeners will wait for the next set of tweets originating in executive time to contradict the speech. If he takes an “I’m right, nobody knows more about (fill in the blank) than I do" approach, Cratic3947 and the rest of his base will be happy and the remainder of the country will cue The Who singing “Won’t Get Fooled Again” at least in their minds.
The more interesting speech tonight will be Stacey Abrams’ response. Remember that when Trump gave his Oval Office “gotta build the wall” speech five weeks or so ago, the Pelosi/Schumer response got higher ratings.
More often than not, either party’s ballyhooed rising star tends to blow this assignment. The assignment seems to be uniquely able to reveal who is not ready for prime time. I have read that Stacey Abrams is an excellent speaker, but I have never heard her, so I am not sure. The opportunity is there. especially given the resurgence in public opinion of the “America is on the wrong track” view that three and four years ago set the table for people to listen to Donald Trump. I see an opportunity for Abrams to contrast the angry and fearful America of Donald Trump with a more positive, inclusive vision. There is so much fear in Donald’s approach: of immigrants; terrorists; gangs; gangs; transgender people; Democrats. If Abrams calls for America to once again become the home of the brave, she might hit a home run.
Too frequently, rising political stars in this spotlight turn out like Jonathan Goff on Sunday – talented but not really ready for the big stage. We’ll see.