Trump Shifted Campaign-Donor Money Into His Private Business After Losing The Election

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

@Ben_Natuf

he was and is free to stay at whatever property he likes.

You are right… and it was done with zero regard to ethics or impropriety.

That used to mean something.

Y’all carried on about Bush staying in Crawford too, but Hawaii is cool?

[WuWei]

@Ben_Natuf

there is nothing unethical about following the law.

Mmmmm. There are bad laws.

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@Ben_Natuf

he was and is free to stay at whatever property he likes.

You are right… and it was done with zero regard to ethics or impropriety.

That used to mean something.

Y’all carried on about Bush staying in Crawford too, but Hawaii is cool?

Who is this “Y’all”?

[STODR]

I can remember when the left was vaping about his business were not going to charge the campaign. The left accused him of illegal campaign donations. Now he is paying them and they are making the same accusations.

[Ben_Natuf]

there are, and if you are inclined there is a moral imperative to disregard them. following them is however always ethical.

[Jezcoe]

@STODR

I can remember when the left was vaping about his business were not going to charge the campaign. The left accused him of illegal campaign donations. Now he is paying them and they are making the same accusations.

Maybe a President funneling money into his business from campaign funds and the government is the problem?

[Ben_Natuf]

funneling money would be a problem, paying for services is not.

[PurpnGold]

@Ben_Natuf

funneling money would be a problem, paying for services is not.

Trump does both…

[Jezcoe]

@Ben_Natuf

funneling money would be a problem, paying for services is not.

The campaign paid $70,000 for the use of Trump’s personal Cessna. While paying a little over $500 for recount efforts.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@Ben_Natuf

he was and is free to stay at whatever property he likes.

You are right… and it was done with zero regard to ethics or impropriety.

That used to mean something.

Y’all carried on about Bush staying in Crawford too, but Hawaii is cool?

Who is this “Y’all”?

Your tribe.

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@Ben_Natuf

he was and is free to stay at whatever property he likes.

You are right… and it was done with zero regard to ethics or impropriety.

That used to mean something.

Y’all carried on about Bush staying in Crawford too, but Hawaii is cool?

Who is this “Y’all”?

Your tribe.

I can only speak for myself.

[WuWei]

@Ben_Natuf

there are, and if you are inclined there is a moral imperative to disregard them. following them is however always ethical.

Moral and ethical are the same thing.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@Ben_Natuf

he was and is free to stay at whatever property he likes.

You are right… and it was done with zero regard to ethics or impropriety.

That used to mean something.

Y’all carried on about Bush staying in Crawford too, but Hawaii is cool?

Who is this “Y’all”?

Your tribe.

I can only speak for myself.

I can speak against your tribe.

[Ben_Natuf]

and? its their money.

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@Ben_Natuf

he was and is free to stay at whatever property he likes.

You are right… and it was done with zero regard to ethics or impropriety.

That used to mean something.

Y’all carried on about Bush staying in Crawford too, but Hawaii is cool?

Who is this “Y’all”?

Your tribe.

I can only speak for myself.

I can speak against your tribe.

Then please, when addressing me, only use claims that I have said and do not attach to me fantasy arguments.

Thanks in advance.

[Ben_Natuf]

no, they most certainly are not.

[Jezcoe]

@Ben_Natuf

and? its their money.

Imagine for a second, during a future Chelsea Clinton run, her campaign using it’s funds to pay her for use of her private business.

[WuWei]

I am addressing you about your tribe. I don’t know or care if you carried on about that specific criticism or not. You are personally doing it now.

It’s petty.

[WuWei]

@Ben_Natuf

no, they most certainly are not.

Yes, they most certainly are. Latin vs Greek.

[Ben_Natuf]

if she used it… no problem. please cite one single politician who has not paid someone closely related to them for some service in a campaign. there is nothing new or alarming about it. campaigns are free to spend money how they see fit with whom they choose to do business.