I try to pride myself on honest debates. To always START with the assumption that the other person comes from a place of good intention. That i can disagree with them - but doesn’t mean the person comes from a bad place.
Sometimes I fail - sometimes i get caught up in emotion and let things get personal. But its not where i normally start and i try to catch myself. I often find myself re-thinking about a point in a debate days /weeks/ months even years later and think “NOW i get what they are saying”. I might still disagree -but often i might change my position a little bit as I always think there is more to learn from people that disagree with you then those that agree.
However -as I read this over and over again, think about it, etc… All I keep coming back to is…
What a A**.
My guess. Trump is doing everything he can to make Omar and Talib the face of the Democratic Party, just as Democrats would have done if Roy Moore had been elected.
I would say that D Trump is especially qualified based on his own behaviour to speak specifically to a total lack of knowledge. Similarly, to speak specifically to great disloyalty of his own actions.
What does making Omar and Talib the face of the Dem party have to do with saying Jews that vote Democrat (around 80%) are “Disloyal”??
For the upteth time -Being against isreal policy is NOT being against Jews.