523

Hunters business partner is testifying Joe was in on the deals today! So the left has to work hard to find a jack smith story. They want to ignore that Biden is prosecuting Trump for everything he did.

1 Like
524

Your twenty year claim does not hold water. They were from his Vice Presidency – and could be anywhere from four to twelve years ago. The non-stop effort to create Biden scandals to deflect from Trump’s legal troubles would be a lot more effective if they did not depend so heavily on making things up.

Submitted for your approval: some facts:

https://www.axios.com/2023/01/12/biden-classified-documents-timeline

525

They were also found in China Town and a plethora of other places and during his time as “senator”, it’s a fact that the prosecution of trumps purpose did not change to what you are claiming till Biden was caught with materials from skivs which in itself is illegal according to Jonathan Turley. How come Christian Saucier was prosecuted for handing over classified materials and working with Feds being caught but not Biden? It’s looking more and more like Biden sold those documents for money from foreign actors, todays meetings with Hunters business partners could be very revealing. They are saying Joe was involved in everything.

526

Where exactly is “China Town”?

As I have said, the lack of precision in throwing dirt at the Biden Barn is why these stories have no traction outside the right wing echo chamber.

You still are ignoring the indictment that Jack Smith brought in the documents case. Sticking to facts would help your case. You just need to find some.

527

Chinatown is a place Feds should not find classified materials pertaining to Biden, how did they get there? Lol it isn’t dirt when Hunter Bidens business partner is about to testify and show evidence Joe was involved in all of a hunters dealings. Again one set of rules for us peasants and others for the Bidens. Saucier lands in jail for taking pictures of a decommissioned boat, and turned over the pictures after being caught and went to jail, Biden spread illegal classified documents over the US gets caught, complies after admitting he committed a crime, and walks free. It’s very damning the IRS is saying prosecutors are now only prosecuting by political optics, not by law. There is little difference from refusing to hand them over and only handing them over after being caught. It’s like a robber getting off after robbing a bank only because he returned the money after being caught. It’s ludicrous. I can’t stand Biden or Trump, but the hypocrisy here is filthy and obvious to independent voters like me. You darn well know Pence would have been prosecuted too if they never found documents of Biden, he too was being investigated.

528

I agree with this.

image

1 Like
529

Again, the hyperbole makes undermines your position. There’s a clear chain of custody for the documents Biden should not have had and it’s not that he was spreading classified information around the US.

Read the timeline I provided, read Jack Smith’s indictment of Trump or just keep throwing mud at the wall and hope something will stick.

Eliminating the space between China and Town still does not make it an actual place.

And when you say one set of rules for the peasants and another for the Bidens are you suggesting Donald Trump is a “peasant.” We ahould wish all peasants had the inherited wealth he did.

You are right that a rich person with access to top notch legal counsel is not going to experience the legal system the same way someone dependent on court appointed attorneys will, but the issue is indicting Donald Trump, who has not lack of advantages.

530

He lost the chain of custody argument when they were found in his garage, there isn’t a single thing in my garage I don’t know about. Go ahead try to rob a bank and get caught and then hope to get the Biden treatment. Better yet, hit a crack pipe, lie on firearm registration and dump the gun outside a school trash bin and hope to Only get a misdemeanor charge! Lol nothing you say holds water. It has nothing to do with top notch lawyers, it has to do with prosecutors like Leslie wolf say they only prosecute through a political lense. She needs to be hauled in and put under oath immediately.

531

Now Hunters business partners are saying Joe was directly involved and have evidence. Joe just needs to announce he isn’t running for re-election the same for Trump and the majority of Americans will rejoice.

532

The main attorney who was accused of refusing to pursue Hunter Biden during last week’s “whistleblower” hearing in Congress was David Weiss. We are now in the curious situation where Weiss is asking to testify at the same sort of public hearing, but Comer and Jordan are insisting he only testify in a closed session.

Why would the two leaders of the Republican effort to investigate all things Biden not want to allow David Weiss to talk to the public?

One thing he might chose to talk about is the frequency with which tax cheats who repay what they owe are: a) indicted for felonies, b) indicted for a misdemeanor or c) not indicted at all?

In case you don’t want to take the time to look things up, the correct answer is c) Not indicated at all.

For a good example, look at the tax case against Donald Trump’s associate Roger Stone.

I appreciate that you are upset that the gun charge against Hunter Biden was not pursued more vigorously. May I assume you are a fan of laws that limit access to firearms.

1 Like
533

That’s the SOP for woke libs. Accuse the GOP of things that they themselves are actually doing.

534

Returned them immediately after 18 years.
Of course Trump wasn’t indicted for taking and possessing classified documents. He could have been, but then that would have required indicting Biden too. It was necessary to carve out something Trump did that Biden didn’t do.
And we are told how having these classified documents was dangerous because others could have gotten hold of them. Was that more dangerous because Trump contested ownership or because Biden kept them in his garage for nearly two decades? Consider the background in Hunter’s access and dealings with foreign entities.

1 Like
537

The simpler explanation is that Trump was charged for something he did that others did not do but that would not play into the victimization narrative.

1 Like
538

No Biden is not prosecuted because he’s a liberal. Same reason REP Michael Grimm went to jail for tax evasion while Bob Menendez and Al Sharpton walk free. We literally had a high ranking IRS agent testify that prosecutors decide who to prosecute by political expediency. IRS agents know more about tax law than prosecutors and they are turning down slam dunk cases based on political optics. They should prosecute because someone broke the law, regardless if they voted for the person. Shapley listed the name of the prosecutor who told them they weren’t prosecuting Hunter and he donated 2k to Joes campaign.

1 Like
539

The name Shapley “disclosed” wasn’t a secret. It was the lead prosecutor – David Weiss.

What also is not a secret is that Shapley has had it in for David Weiss for years whom he publicly accused of blocked a promotion Shapley wanted years before they came together on the Hunter Biden investigation. Shapley claims Weiss gave him a bad performance review, but like so much of the other Biden “evidence,” no document has been provided to back up his claim.

For his part, Weiss has denied each of Shapley’s allegations and has offered to testify publicly before the House Committee. Comer and Jordan only want him to testify in private session.

Can you think of any good reason why these two esteemed Republicans would not some accused of malfeasance to testify where we can all assess his testimony?

540

No it wasn’t. It was one of Weiss’s superiors.

1 Like
541

Wasn’t what?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/10/us/politics/david-weiss-hunter-biden-irs.html

Shapley refuted Wess’ categorization of the investigation as did Merck Garland.

Or are you taking about Shapley’s resentment about how Weill is alleged to have hampered his career?

544

“He surprised us by telling us on the charges, ‘I’m not the deciding official on whether charges are filed,’” Shapley recounted in his May 26 testimony, which the committee released Thursday.

“He then shocked us with the earth-shattering news that the Biden-appointed DC US Attorney Matthew Graves would not allow him to charge in his district,” added Shapley, who said Graves’ refusal to prosecute meant that Hunter, now 53, would not face tax charges related to “foreign income from Burisma [Holdings] and a scheme to evade his income taxes through a partnership with a convicted felon” in 2014 and 2015.”

2 Likes
545

Nobody would pay anybody to say anything in this forum.

2 Likes
546

Meanwhile Biden continues to grift and sell positions in his WH to those who buy Biden artwork! This is only going to get worse, Biden should decide not to run, same for Trump.

1 Like