Trump says he is likely to be criminally indicted over the January 6 event

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

@PurpnGold

Nobody was indicted for just asking questions. Nobody.

spare us the narrative. everyone knows what’s really going on

The narrative is “they were indicted for just asking questions”. However the reality is, the indictment doesn’t say that. I’m certain you read it and can agree with me. Right?

[coolidge]

Libs have no business lecturing to others about a persons past when they elect the shady characters of their own party

[PurpnGold]

@coolidge

Libs have no business lecturing to others about a persons past when they elect the shady characters of their own party

How many have had fraudulent charities or universities?

[coolidge]

Indictments does not mean much when a person can indict a ham sandwich.

[coolidge]

Oh please.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-foundation-donations/

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DougBH

If a case were to be filed in GA, one would think the State would be the logical one to file it. But of course they didn’t have the political interest.

The State did file the charges. It says so right at the top of the indictment.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DougBH

And attorney generals can bring charges in a case like this.

Wut?

No they can’t. AGs aren’t prosecutors.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

The fake electors in Pennsylvania aren’t charged with a crime.

The fake electors in Georgia are, though.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DougBH

attorney generals

Attorneys general

[NickN]

Pelosi lost the gavel in 2022 thanks to President Trump…just saying…

[DisturbedGuy]

@thinkingman

@PurpnGold

Nobody was indicted for just asking questions. Nobody.

spare us the narrative. everyone knows what’s really going on

The wheels of justice are turning. No one is above the law.

[H_Arendt]

@NickN

Pelosi lost the gavel in 2022 thanks to President Trump…just saying…

After all the talk of a. “red wave” election in 2022, if you want to count 2022 as a Republican victory, go to town.

[WuWei]

Mmmmmm. Might want to check that.

[WuWei]

@DisturbedGuy

No one is above the law.

Ridiculous.

[DisturbedGuy]

@WuWei

@DisturbedGuy

No one is above the law.

Ridiculous.

Fact.

[WuWei]

No, it isn’t.

[DisturbedGuy]

@WuWei

No, it isn’t.

Yes, it is. The law can be used to prosecute any citizen.

[WuWei]

Now that’s true. But it isn’t.

[DisturbedGuy]

@WuWei

Now that’s true. But it isn’t.

Then, no one is above the law. There may not be someone with the will to prosecute, but that doesn’t make someone above the law. It just means the powers that be have calculated the risk and made a choice.

[WuWei]

@DisturbedGuy

@WuWei

Now that’s true. But it isn’t.

Then, no one is above the law. There may not be someone with the will to prosecute, but that doesn’t make someone above the law. It just means the powers that be have calculated the risk and made a choice.

It makes the perpetrator above the law.