Trump’s Census Bureau swamp creatures lie by omission

If you want to confirm how deeply entrenched Washington’s swamp creatures are, and how they use their positions of public trust to subvert the very provisions of our Constitution which were designed to prevent abuses of our federal government’s taxing powers, one need only look at the propaganda which is put forth by swamp creatures who are in charge at the United States Census Bureau link

“Census results help determine how billions of dollars in federal funding flow into states and communities each year.”

“The results determine how many seats in Congress each state gets.”

“It’s mandated by the U.S. Constitution in Article 1, Section 2: The U.S. has counted its population every 10 years since 1790.”

Our federal swamp creatures are quick to assert the census is used to “determine how billions of dollars in federal funding flow into states and communities each year.” What is omitted is the census was also intentionally intended to determine how much each State would be obligated to pay if any direct tax would be laid among the States, i.e., both representation and direct taxation would be determined by the rule of apportionment …. a rule which protects and shields the people of each State from the notoriously evil consequences of “democracy” in which 51 percent of the people may vote to burden the remaining population with taxation, while likewise voting to enjoy what has been taken by unequal direct taxation.

Indeed, as our swamp creatures at the Census Bureau note the census is to determine how money may flow into states from the federal government. So, let us not forget by the year 1835, America was manufacturing everything from steam powered ships, to clothing spun and woven by powered machinery and the national debt [which included part of the revolutionary war debt] was completely extinguished and Congress enjoyed a surplus in the federal treasury from tariffs, duties, and customs. And so, by an Act of Congress in June of 1836 all surplus revenue in excess of $5,000,000 was decided to be distributed among the states, and eventually a total of $28,000,000 was distributed among the states by the rule of apportionment in the nature of interest free loans to the states to be recalled if and when Congress decided to make such a recall.

So why do the Census Bureau swamp creatures not inform the public that the census is also intentionally designed to determine each State’s share of any direct tax laid by Congress?

As pointed out by Justice Roberts in the Obamacare Case, and in spite of the Sixteenth Amendment, “The shared responsibility payment is thus not a direct tax that must be apportioned among the several States.”

For an example of a federal direct tax being laid by Congress see the direct tax 1798, in which each state’s apportioned share is itemized LINK

The constitutional requirement that direct taxes “must be apportioned among the several States” [see Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4,] has not been altered since its adoption but is ignored by today’s leadership of both political parties and has resulted in a deadly poison___ un-apportioned corporate and social welfare, which has divided our nation and works to our destruction.

Keep in mind if a direct tax is laid, directly upon the people, and the rule of apportionment is enforced, it turns out to be an equal per capita tax, and prevents the Congress from forcing hard working wage earners who work extra hours to increase their economic station in life from paying a higher amount of the tax than the least productive and unmotivated in our society . . . an idea which socialists and communists fear with a passion, and why they now rail with envy against the productive in our society.

So, why has our President not removed socialists and communists from the Census Bureau who lie by omission and refuse to acknowledge the Census is also intended to determine each state’s share of any direct tax laid, which if followed today, would help to restore our constitutionally limited “Republican Form of Government”, its free enterprise/free market system, and also help end the poison of both corporate and social welfare being doled out at the federal head which is tearing our country apart?


They are not “liberals” or “progressives”. The Democrat Party Leadership is infested with notoriously evil communists and socialists who delude, lure and addict our nations needy with free government cheese.

I do not disagree with the purpose of the Census.

But there have not been any true direct taxes imposed by the Federal Government in a long time.

So any omission does not appear to be for a malicious purpose.

If direct taxes were still being imposed, I could see where omission could be malicious.

In any event, just as well that we DON’T have any federal direct taxes in this day and age.

I pay plenty to several States. :smile:


The Census Bureau is saying things to get people to fill out their census forms.
They are not giving a history lesson about what the census used to be, but isn’t any more.

“Every single person, no matter your documentation status, no matter your housing status, income, etc., is to be counted,” she said, before assuring viewers that the data included is “completely confidential” and not shared with other agencies.

I need a place to put this for a while.

All free persons are to be counted.

Free food. Free medical. Free from taxes.

Those are separate issues the rules of counting. There are none, count everybody.

Yes, reward illegal.

I know! Forget the census! Let’s count the populations of Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. We can proportion them to the sanctuary states!

1 Like

Well, I didn’t say I liked it, but them’s the rules.


as usual.

1 Like


How dare Census officials try to get people to fill out their Census forms so the government can get an accurate count of who is here!!! What an outrage!!

Dancing Queen isn’t a census official.

So you think illegals should be a consideration for establishing policies across the country?


Current text of the Apportionment clause and Amendment 16:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse [ sic ] three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

My version:

Amendment ???

Section 1. Commencing with the Census and Apportionment next following the ratification of this Article of Amendment, Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall consist of the whole number of Citizens, Nationals and lawfully admitted resident aliens. Neither any alien lawfully in the United States but not admitted to permanent residence nor any alien unlawfully in the United States shall be included in the apportionment count.

Section 2. Any non-resident alien lawfully within the United States and any alien unlawfully present in the United States shall be counted and such counts may be used by the United States and the several States for any purpose other than apportionment.

Section 3. The United States shall not impose any Capitation Tax or any other form of Direct Tax. This Apportionment Clause shall not be a defense to any charge of tax evasion in any Court of the United States and any attempt to present an apportionment defense to a tax evasion charge shall be considered frivolous and shall subject the attorney representing the defendant, or the defendant himself if proceeding pro se, to sanctions.

This would create a separate count apportionment count for Citizens, Nationals and Resident Aliens. It would create a separate count that could be added to the first count for purposes of doling out welfare and other benefits.

Illegals and transient lawful aliens should not be counted for apportionment purposes.

This also permanently ends the possibility of direct federal taxation.


Yes. 100%. Without an accurate count communities won’t know how much funding is needed to deal with their populations.

Ok then.

Maybe we could have a North American Union and just say ■■■■ the borders. lol