Trump restores health care option Obamma took away

And…?

and what? you both act as if with liability only nothing is going to be covered in regards to the other person and their property. That is false.

It is also false that other policies will cover everything and you have no chance of being sued.

Varies by state on what “exempt” property is . . .

Utah’s list of exemp property from civil judgement

OJ was able to protect his pension. What is your source for the inability to attach one’s other assets in a civil suit?

varies by state

Then there are also property that is covered under federal law in regards to civil cases as well.

Too bad about those pre-existing conditions disappearing, though. Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

As long as she promises never to go to the ER without a wad of cash, sure. Enjoy that option.

Far be it for me to tell you how to protect yourself and your family’s financial well being. But I guess when one has very little in the way of assets to protect, you don’t need any extra protection,

Rude.

10 char

1 Like

Very far. It should also be very far from the government to tell me as well.

You could always keep your kids on your healthcare plan as long as you liked, you just had to pay for it instead of spreading the cost among the people who didn’t have kids.

1 Like

If you had subsidized group health insurance, I don’t think you could just plop your adult children onto it.

Well said!!

lol - look at you projecting your cheapness onto us folks without kids. I don’t mind paying some for his boy at all. Although I hadn’t even noticed that I was.

It’s insane that trump is allowing bad health insurance to be sold.

1800 doesn’t even cover one months premiums of good health insurance.

It’s the government job to protect people and in this case they are failing.

Sorry snow, need to protect the citizens from bad insurance.

It why we don’t have payday loan stores in jersey.

To protect the citizens from themselves.

Allan

Of course you could, insurance companies would always sell you coverage for as many people as you cared to insure, you just had to pay for it.

Can you point me to “protect people from themselves” as an enumerated power of the federal government in the constitution or anywhere in the debate in it’s adoption?

2 Likes

Hilarious, so it’s cheapness not to want to be forced to pay for the health care of other people’s kids, even when in some cases their parents make more money than I do?

Its common sense as pointed out by many here.

Many federal agencies protect the dumb masses.

remember Fen-fen.

People would still be taking and dying it if it were not for the FDA.

how bout heroin? Or cocaine? or methyl alcohol, for human consumption?

how bout govt regulation of how much pollutant go into the air or for heavens sake, the clean water act.

we regulate things all the time for the benefit of the unwashed masses, who dont know any better.

Allan

“Common sense” is in no way a reference to an enumerated power granted to the federal government to “protect people from themselves”. Nor is a policy that does not cover things I have no need to be insured against a faulty or dangerous product I need protection from. As an example, being in our late fifties, we have no need to be insured against pregnancy. Or against addiction for that matter.