This argument has never made much sense to me. Clinton and Trump flew on Epstein’s plane. But Clinton was doing it for nefarious purposes, while Trump was . . . merely scouting possible locations to do Christian missionary work and build houses for the homeless.
It’s going to take a lot of suckers to buy Trump a new plane, even at the Barnum-rate of one per minute. A 787 (Your Favorite President deserves no less) runs ~$200M.
However, Boeing is headquartered in Illinois, a state that did not vote for Trump. He’d probably be much more comfortable in a Sukhoi business jet, which would cost less than half as much and is made by a company that no doubt fully supports Trump.
I am trying to imagine this board if Barack Obama used his PAC to raise money to buy himself a replacement jet. Even as a hypothetical, it barely makes sense.
So Trump asking for donations for a new plane is an outrage but the Grifter in Chief selling influence in exchange for fleecing the country is quite ok.
You just can’t make this stuff up!
p.s. Lyin Spin Psaki is now blaming the inflation on the russians…as though we didn’t already have it!
Its not an outrage…its hysterical!.. What’s even funnier is…there are rubes out there that will donate for it. Like I said earlier in a different thread…Cons are easy marks. This proves my point…lol