Donald Trump at the “Heroin Summit.”
He took the conference name literally, not seriously.
Donald Trump at the “Heroin Summit.”
He took the conference name literally, not seriously.
Fat donald going senile in front of us, that’s what.
No, what you’re watching is a big fake who doesn’t care about anything and doesn’t bother to prepare before speaking to an audience.
Folks, this is comedy gold.
We will stop nothing can stop us.
The Great Communicator.
How could that be? He’s reading off a teleprompter.
Nothing stops you, I can tell you…
Paul_Thomson:Social media platforms deny being publishers. They escape slander/libel/defamation suits on that basis. If someone is publishing illegal material, social media should be reporting them to law enforcement, and let the law deal with them. They don’t get to edit content and also not be publishers.
You have a right to free speech.
You have no right to use a private platform that you yourself do not own.
or pay for.
Law enforcement has become hot! They’re been having a little problem, but they’re hot! -fat donald
He seems high as a kite during an anti-drug soeech.
I can’t see it, but he’s probably on his adderall.
I can’t see it, but he’s probably on his adderall.
We need a closeup of his eyes. They’re probably unnaturally dilated.
Again.
The Supreme Court has authority to overturn an unjust conviction, if constitutional rights were violated. It’s an interesting legal question if they can overturn a “conviction” by Congress.
PhillyGuy
Not really… nobody with any knowledge of the constitution believes the supreme court can or would overturn an impeachment conviction…
PhillyGuy:The Supreme Court has authority to overturn an unjust conviction, if constitutional rights were violated. It’s an interesting legal question if they can overturn a “conviction” by Congress.
PhillyGuy
Not really… nobody with any knowledge of the constitution believes the supreme court can or would overturn an impeachment conviction…
reading some of these posts convinces me that a lot of people don’t know what impeachment is.
If at least 20 Republican senators were willing to convict Trump, it’s doubtful that the conservatives on the Supreme Court would disagree.
Mexico has already started a war with the US. It’s using illegal immigrants against the US as economical and biological weapons.
Is that why D Trump’s business employed some undocumented workers?
Obama just talked about how bad the opioid crisis is. Trump is actually doing something about it. The Left prefers the guy who just talked about how bad a problem is.
PhillyGuy
Uh uh. The Supreme Court has this problem with convictions without evidence, which is what the Mueller report said, no evidence.
PhillyGuy
Uh uh. The Supreme Court has this problem with convictions without evidence, which is what the Mueller report said, no evidence.
PhillyGuy
Delusional nonsense… the constitution and supreme
Court precedence are absolutely clear about the power of impeachment. Good lord, that anyone is even debating this is indicative of how far the GOP has fallen…
The Constitution gives Congress the authority to try and judge the President for “high crimes and misdeamanors”. Since the Congress is taking over the role of the courts, you could argue the Supreme Court should have the authority of overturning a conviction based on no evidence, which is what the Mueller report said, no evidence.
PhillyGuy
The Constitution gives Congress the authority to try and judge the President for “high crimes and misdeamanors”. Since the Congress is taking over the role of the courts, you could argue the Supreme Court should have the authority of overturning a conviction based on no evidence, which is what the Mueller report said, no evidence.
PhillyGuy
They could argue all day long, the Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear where the power of impeachment rests and who determines what is a high crime or misdemeanor…
PhillyGuy:The Constitution gives Congress the authority to try and judge the President for “high crimes and misdeamanors”. Since the Congress is taking over the role of the courts, you could argue the Supreme Court should have the authority of overturning a conviction based on no evidence, which is what the Mueller report said, no evidence.
PhillyGuy
They could argue all day long, the Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear where the power of impeachment rests and who determines what is a high crime or misdemeanor…
we’re gonna have to debate reality for awhile.