Trump is vindicated, found not guilty in the Senate. What next?

[WildRose]

Some folks seem to make a career of diving into dumpsters and lighting them on fire.

[TrumpGurl]

@WildRose

The outcome of his trial was known before the articles were even delivered.

By probably the middle or end of next week the trial will be over, Trump will be vindicated so what next?

Will the democrats make him the first president to be impeached multiple times as the tantrum continues or will they get down to business and start working with the Senate and President to do “The People’s Business”.

I am truly frightened at how millions of Americans are willingly and wantonly blinding themselves to what this illegal overthrow of the government actually is. Where to start, where to start…

First of all, NO high crimes or misdemeanors are even listed in the articles of impeachment so he was accused of nothing. NOTHING! So there should not even be a trial.

Second: Remember that the Democrats called for Impeachment BEFORE Trump was even in office! That is illegal. A number of Democrats are on record saying they wanted to impeach Trump before he even took office. That is proof that these fascist Democrats from day one have had a sentence in search of a crime . They already knew the sentence: Removal from office. For three years they have been in search of a crime. They thought the Mueller investigation would provide it but it failed. They tried emoluments, obstruction, and all manner of stupid crimes but they failed too. At the last minute they cooked up these faulty impeachment articles that don’t even contain crimes!! And now they cry about wanting a fair trial?

Case dismissed!!

[Kelby]

@WuWei

@Kelby

He can’t! That’s the point.

He doesn’t have to! That’s the point.

More kafkatrapping.

He does, in order to avoid articles of obstruction (along with those from the Mueller probe) and to convince the American electorate he isn’t hiding anything.

My guess is they (the electorate) won’t buy it. The polls say so.

His base is beyond redemption.

[Samm]

@Kelby

@Samm

@Kelby

@Samm

Are you saying that if the defense provides no evidence of innocence that it means they are hiding evidence of guilt? What do you think this is, the Spanish Inquisition?

“Evidence of innocence”, lol. What is that?

Evidence and testimony is just that, and the Trump team is hiding it.

That is what you are asking for. You are asking him to prove that the charges are false.

He can’t! That’s the point.

No … the point is that he is not required to. The entire onus of determining guilt rests with the prosecution.

[WuWei]

@Kelby

@WuWei

@Kelby

He can’t! That’s the point.

He doesn’t have to! That’s the point.

More kafkatrapping.

He does, in order to avoid articles of obstruction (along with those from the Mueller probe) and to convince the American electorate he isn’t hiding anything.

My guess is they (the electorate) won’t buy it. The polls say so.

His base is beyond redemption.

No, he doesn’t. You © just got him reelected. Congratulations.

[Kelby]

@Samm

@Kelby

@Samm

@Kelby

@Samm

Are you saying that if the defense provides no evidence of innocence that it means they are hiding evidence of guilt? What do you think this is, the Spanish Inquisition?

“Evidence of innocence”, lol. What is that?

Evidence and testimony is just that, and the Trump team is hiding it.

That is what you are asking for. You are asking him to prove that the charges are false.

He can’t! That’s the point.

No … the point is that he is not required to. The entire onus of determining guilt rests with the prosecution.

In this case, it resides with a tainted jury, who won’t push him, it appears.

They will reap as they sow.

[WuWei]

@Kelby

His base is beyond redemption.

All of them?

[Samm]

@WildRose

Some folks seem to make a career of diving into dumpsters and lighting them on fire.

Well, he should take one of your firearms safety classes. He keeps shooting himself in the foot.

[Zander]

@Guvnah

@Zander

That call was the whole basis for his impeachment.

And this post should just be stamped WRONG

You’re confused.

TDS does that to people.

Oh no, is the TDS tourettes back already? We were doing so well.

[Kelby]

@WuWei

@Kelby

@WuWei

@Kelby

He can’t! That’s the point.

He doesn’t have to! That’s the point.

More kafkatrapping.

He does, in order to avoid articles of obstruction (along with those from the Mueller probe) and to convince the American electorate he isn’t hiding anything.

My guess is they (the electorate) won’t buy it. The polls say so.

His base is beyond redemption.

No, he doesn’t. You © just got him reelected. Congratulations.

Blah, blah, blah. I still have faith in the middle America voter.

[Samm]

@Kelby

@Samm

@Kelby

@Samm

@Kelby

@Samm

Are you saying that if the defense provides no evidence of innocence that it means they are hiding evidence of guilt? What do you think this is, the Spanish Inquisition?

“Evidence of innocence”, lol. What is that?

Evidence and testimony is just that, and the Trump team is hiding it.

That is what you are asking for. You are asking him to prove that the charges are false.

He can’t! That’s the point.

No … the point is that he is not required to. The entire onus of determining guilt rests with the prosecution.

In this case, it resides with a tainted jury, who won’t push him, it appears.

They will reap as they sow.

Yep … reelection.

[WuWei]

@Kelby

In this case, it resides with a tainted jury, who won’t push him, it appears.

They will reap as they sow.

Does “tainted” mean duly elected in some other language?

Was the House tainted when they voted to impeach?

[Samm]

@Kelby

Blah, blah, blah. I still have faith in the middle America voter.

So do we.

[WildRose]

Pretty accurate.

[WuWei]

@Kelby

Blah, blah, blah. I still have faith in the middle America voter.

the same ones who put him in there in '16?

Let me help you: Nobody gives a ■■■■ about Ukraine. If the economy holds, it’s over.

You think you’re going to knock Trump off with Biden? He’s a loon. He will swing at Trump during the first debate.

The Bern?

Pocahontas?

[WildRose]

No, the point is that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty.

The defense is under no obligation whatsoever to prove the innocence of the defendant.

As for the public? You’re right, they see what’s going on and that’s why dem’s are upside down in the polls on impeachment and removal.

Even if 100% of democrats are for it, and end up angry over it, they still lose as long as they can’t win over independents because Republicans aren’t buying it at all.

[WildRose]

No, that isn’t what the polls are showing. Scroll up.

[Kelby]

@WildRose

No, the point is that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty.

The defense is under no obligation whatsoever to prove the innocence of the defendant.

As for the public? You’re right, they see what’s going on and that’s why dem’s are upside down in the polls on impeachment and removal.

Even if 100% of democrats are for it, and end up angry over it, they still lose as long as they can’t win over independents because Republicans aren’t buying it at all.

“Innocent until proven guilty”? A noble concept, that.

Unfortunately, it fails when the defendant is able to control access to evidence that would decide his guilt.

Unless you wish to crown a king in this republic.

[Kelby]

@WuWei

@Kelby

Blah, blah, blah. I still have faith in the middle America voter.

the same ones who put him in there in '16?

Let me help you: Nobody gives a ■■■■ about Ukraine. If the economy holds, it’s over.

You think you’re going to knock Trump off with Biden? He’s a loon. He will swing at Trump during the first debate.

The Bern?

Pocahontas?

My dog catcher is better suited to be President than Trump.

[WuWei]

@Kelby

@WildRose

No, the point is that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty.

The defense is under no obligation whatsoever to prove the innocence of the defendant.

As for the public? You’re right, they see what’s going on and that’s why dem’s are upside down in the polls on impeachment and removal.

Even if 100% of democrats are for it, and end up angry over it, they still lose as long as they can’t win over independents because Republicans aren’t buying it at all.

“Innocent until proven guilty”? A noble concept, that.

Unfortunately, it fails when the defendant is able to control access to evidence that would decide his guilt.

Unless you wish to crown a king in this republic.

You aren’t even trying anymore.