Trump is hijacking 4th of July- changing it from a national celebration to a campaign event

[WuWei]

@party-free

A single WaPo article is LEC INDUCING HYSTERIA!!! ####$

Every lib post until this morning. TANKS!!! ####$

And it also induced WHATABOUTISM!!!

[WuWei]

@party-free

How many prior 7/4 parades in the US were military style parades featuring tanks, planes, etc?

WHATABOUTISM!!!####&$$$$

[party-free]

No, there wasn’t whataboutism. Repeat it as much as you like if it helps you feel less hurt today, but there was none.

And libs here arent the LEC.

[wonderingrover]

@CaughtInTheMiddle

Your history books were wrong…

One if by land, two if by sea, three if by air, four if rerouted to Hartford.

But if you fly private jet, you get to choose your own number…

[WuWei]

@party-free

No, there wasn’t whataboutism. Repeat it as much as you like if it helps you feel less hurt today, but there was none.

And libs here arent the LEC.

You’re doing it now.

Read the posts again. Slowly. I didn’t say the libs here are the LEC.

#readingisfun-damental

[party-free]

No. Again, forming a basis of comparison.

The cost was a primary concern for many, so comparing the cost of prior parades of a basis of comparison is totes legit.

That’s not whataboutism.

[SottoVoce]

He did “hijack” the event. He demanded the presence of military vehicles and gave himself the main address which Presidents have stayed away from. This will all still cost us millions of dollars more than if he would have kept himself out of the celebration. So:

Hijacked/inserted himself into the event: Yes
Gave himself the key address: Yes
Made his address a campaign stump: No
Cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars: Yes

So, he went 1 for 3. What crow am I supposed to be eating? None.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@SottoVoce

He did “hijack” the event. He demanded the presence of military vehicles and gave himself the main address which Presidents have stayed away from. This will all still cost us millions of dollars more than if he would have kept himself out of the celebration. So:

Hijacked/inserted himself into the event: Yes
Gave himself the key address: Yes
Made his address a campaign stump: No
Cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars: Yes

So, he went 1 for 3. What crow am I supposed to be eating? None.

Come on. They don’t even care about all the limos he rented in Europe. They sure as hell are not going to care about this wasted money.

Fiscal conservatism is dead.

[party-free]

@WuWei

I didn’t say the libs here are the LEC.

I’m asking for examples of the LEC inducing the hysteria. You have replied to me with 1 example so far.

[Snow96]

@FloridaYankee

The public paid for the whole thing. Would it be illegal for him to use it like that? Cuz it definitely would have been illegal if he went into a political rant DURING the event.

Seeing as how speaches and events that are completely government paid are public affairs (a lot of them) that they are recorded and used later by all sorts of people is completely legal. Do you want to hold the same standard to Congress?

[WuWei]

@SottoVoce

He did “hijack” the event. He demanded the presence of military vehicles and gave himself the main address which Presidents have stayed away from. This will all still cost us millions of dollars more than if he would have kept himself out of the celebration. So:

Hijacked/inserted himself into the event: Yes
Gave himself the key address: Yes
Made his address a campaign stump: No
Cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars: Yes

So, he went 1 for 3. What crow am I supposed to be eating? None.

Atta way! Stick to The Narrative! When it gets damaged, salvage it.

More WHATABOUTISM!!!####

Trump doesn’t have to President the way you want him to. You lost.

[wonderingrover]

I’ve always wondered what it would have been like to see George Washington walk off of Air Force One the first time. It had to have been quite a sight.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

This is the administration that completely killed even the hint of fiscal conservatism.

And they exposed many Christians for who they actually are.

I say Bravo!!

[FloridaYankee]

@Snow96

@FloridaYankee

The public paid for the whole thing. Would it be illegal for him to use it like that? Cuz it definitely would have been illegal if he went into a political rant DURING the event.

Seeing as how speaches and events that are completely government paid are public affairs (a lot of them) that they are recorded and used later by all sorts of people is completely legal. Do you want to hold the same standard to Congress?

Whatever the current law states.

[Sknyluv]

@WuWei

So the Washington Post told the libs he was going to do something he didn’t do and now you (collective) are having crow for breakfast.

The hysteria was evident here. Constant comparisons to North Korea and Russia, libs triggered by tanks, “He’s making our holiday a campaign event! Aaaaagghh!!! SNAP!”

Even your post, “with his track record people had good reason” to be wrong.

The King of Trolls wins again.

Has Trump earned the benefit of doubt?

[WuWei]

@party-free

@WuWei

I didn’t say the libs here are the LEC.

I’m asking for examples of the LEC inducing the hysteria. You have replied to me with 1 example so far.

I gave you two threads of roughly 700 posts. Every one of which made by a lib prior to this morning was evidence of lib hysteria induced by the Washington Post article. One article.

I also gave you a CNN propaganda video for the illiterate. Nobody gets left behind in the GLN.

You have a nice day now. Mind chewing that crow well, I’ve heard they can be a choking hazard.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@wonderingrover

I’ve always wondered what it would have been like to see George Washington walk off of Air Force One the first time. It had to have been quite a sight.

He actually missed the flight and there’s video…

https://twitter.com/TiMEoFPoSTiNG/status/1147011486776086528?s=19

[WuWei]

@Sknyluv

Has Trump earned the benefit of doubt?

Have libs learned the lesson?

[Sknyluv]

@WuWei

Have libs learned the lesson?

Well. I think my question takes precedence. Trump has not earned the benefit of doubt, he has not pivoted, he has not changed … his intentions should always be questioned. So no. There was no lesson to learn here.

[NebraskaFootball]

@SottoVoce

He did “hijack” the event. He demanded the presence of military vehicles and gave himself the main address which Presidents have stayed away from. This will all still cost us millions of dollars more than if he would have kept himself out of the celebration. So:

Hijacked/inserted himself into the event: Yes
Gave himself the key address: Yes
Made his address a campaign stump: No
Cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars: Yes

So, he went 1 for 3. What crow am I supposed to be eating? None.

Nailed it. Good post.