Trump investigations

They need to read the Mueller report.

Haā€¦

1 Like

[quote=ā€œApocalypto, post:358, topic:176706, full:trueā€]

Riiight.

ā€œAccordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate himā€

I would say ā€œCant say that he did, cant say that he didnā€™tā€ is about right, based on what you copied.

Keep telling each other that.

Clear as day.

image
image

Did you go to much effort to exclude the words between ā€œBased on the facts and theā€ā€¦andā€¦ā€œit also does not exonerate him.ā€? Did you consider that part irrelevant, maybe?

Ok, letā€™s discuss. what are your thoughts on this statement?

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.

Or an impeachment proceeding.

My thoughts are that it was quickly followed with the following sentence:

"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate himā€

Which basically says ā€œCant say that he did, cant say that he didnā€™tā€.

And that left it up to the DOJ to make the legal decision.

Surely you agree that not finding that someone didnā€™t commit a crime is not the same as concluding that someone did commit a crime?

Itā€™s basically giving us the option to find out if fat donald is a criminal or not since the DOJ cannot indict a sitting president.

They can, however, state if a crime has or hasnā€™t been committed. There is nothing preventing them from doing that.

Kind of nice the dems will have no track record of legislation going into the next electionsā€¦

They will spent the entire time on what will be a very old story by 2020

Fat donald can literally shoot someone on 5th ave. and the DOJ wouldnā€™t be able to indict a sitting president.

Because he didnt read it

You really dont

Backfire? What world do you live in? This report was bad for trump and the only thing that stopped him from being indicted was doj policy, barr, and mueller being an honorable personā€¦

You defend a criminal

Your wild speculation is irrelevantā€¦
That was looked into by the ig and it shows you are wrongā€¦but you knew that but we have to press the narritive of that lie regardlessā€¦

Oh goodie thats out of contextā€¦i guess this is gonna be your new pushā€¦

Then you are wrongā€¦but we are wasting time here because you arent going to accept the truth

Oh this is richā€¦doug is complaining that someone took something out of contextā€¦