Your incite is made clear by the fact that I read the report.
He states that collusion isn’t even a legal term and that he is going to look for conspiracy with Russia because conspiracy is a legal term. Read the report and that will be explained to you.
He found no conspiracy because there was no conspiracy to find.
Anyone who would even hint that there was conspiracy out there but he just didn’t find it because of x is just showing their bias. If they didn’t find it, they couldn’t possibly know it was there, now could they?
The charge of conspiracy was limited to whether or not the Trump campaign conspired with Russia’s illegal interference of the election. We do not have any evidence that Trump directly told Russia to hack the DNC or that the Trump campaign helped orchestrate Russia’s propaganda campaign.
That doesn’t exonerate Trump at all, it simply means that Trump was the puppet and not the puppeteer. The report contains dozens of pages detailing how the Trump campaign sought help from the Russians, how the Russian’s operation helped Trump get elected and even how Trump associates promised favors. All of these things the Trump campaign lied about and tried to hide.
If you don’t find any of that disturbing it’s pretty clear why.
Nope…had you rrad the report you would know why he didnt find any that could have been brough up on charges.
Bias? Lol please kid…dont preempt the failings of your argument with am excuse that everyone else must be bias because they dont accept your versions of events.