Orygun
1864
Yeah thats quite a chyron.
Update!
Fox News has responded to the attention its coverage of former President Donald Trump’s speech got last night, when a chyron called President Joe Biden a “wannabe dictator.”
“The chyron was taken down immediately and was addressed,” a Fox News spokesperson said on Wednesday.
“It was a perfect Chyron”
1 Like
Orygun
1867
Yeah this is what I was assuming- trying to get evidence removed as inadmissible due to technicalities and leaning on the judge, and then delaying. Eventually the main work will be getting a good jury pool.
But as to an actual rational defense for the substance of the matter? I just don’t see it.
Anyone can “legally contest” anything they want. But in this case, (1) Trump didn’t; and (2) if he had, he’d have lost.
1 Like
At a minimum, he’d have to officially order it declassified.
interesting quote from someone who knows a thing or two about Trump
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/13/donald-trump-arraignment-day-speech/
“He’s scared ■■■■■■■■■■ said John Kelly, his former chief of staff. “This is the way he compensates for that. He gives people the appearance he doesn’t care by doing this. For the first time in his life, it looks like he’s being held accountable. Up until this point in his life, it’s like, I’m not going to pay you; take me to court. He’s never been held accountable before.”
Does refusing to answer legally prove one way or the other?
Below is an example of what that declassification process and order would look like. This is a published memorandum from the day before Trump left office in an attempt to declassify documents related to Crossfire Hurricane.
You might notice that Trump didn’t just wave his magic wand and declassify everything. He negotiated with the FBI and others to redact certain portions.
Memorandum of January 19, 2021
**Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s **
**Crossfire Hurricane Investigation **
Memorandum for the Attorney General[,] the Director of National Intelligence[, and] the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency:
My decision to declassify materials within the binder is subject to the limits identified above and does not extend to materials that must be protected from disclosure pursuant to orders of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and does not require the disclosure of certain personally identifiable information or any other materials that must be protected from disclosure under applicable law. Accordingly, at my direction, the Attorney General has conducted an appropriate review to ensure that materials provided in the binder may be disclosed by the White House in accordance with applicable law.
LOL your continued determination to defend defend defend with an attempt to try and ask philosophical legal questions is admirable
1 Like
Samm
1875
That’s the law. What was Trump’s intent?
Samm
1876
Why do you find that funny? Do you think it was okay for Biden to hold onto documents that he had no right to possess in the first place? If so, what is your logic behind believing so?
…to retain national defense information.
Orygun
1878
Well you’d have to ask Pence too. How did those files get inadvertently taken?
Samm
1879
Did you miss the word “yet”? What will the US do if Russia crosses the line and engages a NATO member or escalates to deploy nuclear or chemical weapons?
We are at war in every respect other than by deploying troops into the combat arena. And ten will get you twenty that we have military personnel on the ground in Ukraine at this moment and have since days after the Russians invaded.
1 Like
Samm
1880
That’s a lot like saying “he’s dead, he can’t be murdered.” 
Samm
1881
For God’s sake man, he had them stored openly in boxes stacked in his garage (among other obvious places in his house) how could he not know?
1 Like
Samm
1882
Better yet, the Prosecutor should hire you. 
1 Like
Orygun
1883
Again- there is no way to prove Biden or Pence knew they had taken those files and that it wasn’t inadvertent. There is definite proof that Trump knew he had files he should not have.