110

They had investors. Do you think the investors made a good or bad investment?

111

Note: above article is 3+ years old and headline is no longer true about turning profit

Twitter loses $2billion over 10 years == predatory, unfair illegal

Lord trump loses $1billion in 1 year == that’s just business he is a master making millions now

1 Like
112

Is that what you call operating at huge losses totaling two billion for ten years? Not immediately?

113

Much better than $1billion in 1 year

114

Err no, the headline holds up, they be making a profit now but they still lost a lot of money, they haven’t made it all back. And Trump lost a billion but it wasn’t by deliberately pricing his product for less than it cost to deliver.

115

And twitter did that how?

116

Wikipedia is predatory

117

I thought capitalism is supposed to fix all this? Free markets baby!!!

118

When the model is to offer the service to the user for free… how does one “undercharge”?

1 Like
119

Needs more tax cuts!

3 Likes
120

Predatory! :lion:

121

No, they are a non-profit. Apples and oranges

122

https://www.inc.com/drew-hendricks/5-successful-companies-that-didn-8217-t-make-a-dollar-for-5-years.html

Look at all these predators

123

No profits???

124

Yea if OBAMA wasn’t president I could have wrote a platform myself

125

Do you need me to provide a definition for non-profit?

126

How can I compete with an organization that makes noooo prooffiiittzss

1 Like
127

Yes, we have been letting a lot of companies get away with it and it may also be legal but it’s still an unfair and uncompetitive practice.

128

Ok great, start a thread. Or is this whole thing just you being mad about Twitter and want to censor it

1 Like
129

You mean you support a company that is predatory toward encyclopedia manufacturers that never intends to make a profit?

Wow!

1 Like