John, we all know your routine by now. You quote secondary sources as if they are Supreme Court rules—as well as overturned, century-old rulings, as well as dicta.

You don’t even understand the plain wording of an amendment that explains how our taxing works.

You’re content to be wrong on a variety of legal issues, somehow believing that repetition will change reality.

Decades later, how is this strategy working out for you?

1 Like