344

I know what metadata is.

The article specifically mentioned metadata in the header and footer of each email was where they found information that showed a courtesy copy of each email was being generated and sent to a third party.

@adroit is saying you wouldn’t see anything in the header and footer of each email if a courtesy copy was being generated and sent. The code that was doing that would not change or add to email metadata.

That I don’t know and I’m sure @peek-a-boo doesn’t either. I’ll trust that @adroit can provide some credentials as to why he would know.

345

Wheels are falling off the collusion delusion wagon. When it wrecks, the would-be jailers will be the jailees.

346

You go with that.

347

The article claims no such thing.

348

I do (e-mail expertise), but discussing these technical details with trump supporters is a hopeless endeavor at best.

349

raises hand

350

You people are hilarious. One does not need “credentials” to know what metadata is.
Your own slack jawed amazement at the complexities of computers is showing.

351

This is almost too funny.

Trump’s campaign was being spied on. That is no longer in dispute.

Trump knew this and only made the wiretap comment when the story broke. That information was in the public domain, so it was no longer classified.

Trump used archaic terminology “wiretap”. That conveniently allowed Intelligence agencies to accurately state that Trump wasn’t “wiretapped”.

Trump-haters had a field day, painting Trump as a doofus with no clue. Trump knew exactly what was going on, even though he didn’t articulate it very well.

We now see that his campaign was being spied on, just as he stated.

352

Libs googled this

And then looked at this

Samsung-Galaxy-J7-Star-Blue-1-3x.jpeg934×1500 108 KB

And then said “UH UH… No. We got him in another lie. Twump is lying. There ain’t no wire on my cell phone”

353

Irrelevant. Ask Duncan Hunter.

354

If I had a nickel for every time I hear a Trumpist say “I don’t listen to Rush or Sean”, I’d be a rich person. Why are they so embarrassed to admit so?

1 Like
355

Your microwave is spying on you.

356

I’m convinced you don’t know what the speech and debate clause has to do with revealing classified information in the conduct of congressional business.

357

Ah… you remember that discussion. Have you ever researched, observed, funded, read, or talked to anyone about microwave imagery? Ever? Does the word “bistatic” mean anything to you?

I didn’t think so. This simply confirms my assertion that libs know very little in the domain of real science and engineering.

358

Trump was not being spied on. His “campaign” was not being spied on. Page was being surveilled with a warrant due to his interactions with Russia.

359

I was running SIGINT back on the german trenches when you were in diapers, sonny boy. I single handedly took down the Stasi with two campbells soup cans and a string. You think your dishwasher is just a dishwasher? You got another ■■■■■■■ thing coming, son. Coffee pots, in my hands, could take down the nation. Your remote control might as well be a hand grenade. Welcome to the new world.

360

Yes, it ■■■■■■■ does.

The Chinese wrote code that was embedded in the server, which was kept in Clinton’s residence in upstate New York. The code generated an instant “courtesy copy” for nearly all of her emails and forwarded them to the Chinese company, according to the sources.
…
“When [the ICIG] did a very deep dive, they found in the actual metadata — the data which is at the header and footer of all the emails — that a copy, a ‘courtesy copy,’ was being sent to a third party and that third party was a known Chinese public company that was involved in collecting intelligence for China,” the former intelligence officer told TheDCNF."

The article claims that:

  1. Code was embedded on the server
  2. Upon a deep dive inspection, the metadata included a “courtesy copy” to send the email to a foreign entity that was placed there by the embedded code
  3. In order for #2 to occur, the embedded code would have to alter the headers of the email messages before being delivered.
361

It’s bigoted to lump people into a group like that.

Middle age is between 45-65 years of age. You do understand that even people in their sixties were working with the first computers, which did not have a GUI or plug-and-play. We actually had to get down to the code level to install, write files and edit programs to get them to run the way we needed them to. We had to write start-up files to get our computers to recognize our video cards, storage devices, sound cards, monitors, printers, modems, etc…

We had electronic devices with tubes or circuit cards that you could actually replace components on, so we had to know the basics of electronics and mechanical devices. Now everything is a throw away object.

If anything, the majority of newest generation are dumbed down. They don’t need to know the basics for how things work, they just swipe here and there, and everything just works magically for them. If their phone. or other entertainment device doesn’t work, they just trade it in for a new one. Pretty soon people won’t even need to know how to drive a car, and cursive writing… what’s that?

362

No, friend. But I have helped develop both coherent and incoherent microwave imaging and locating systems. But I confess, my experience only goes back about 10 years.

My analysis of such systems goes back twice… almost 3 times as far.

What you don’t know can’t hurt you but it sure can make you look like a typical dumb lib.

363

The guy you are responding to is projecting.