Trump/Barr Cover Up

FBI Statement on HPSCI Memo

**The FBI takes seriously its obligations to the FISA Court and its compliance with procedures overseen by career professionals in the Department of Justice and the FBI. We are committed to working with the appropriate oversight entities to ensure the continuing integrity of the FISA process.

With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it. As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.**

This was prior to Mueller’s investigation and what is now being suggested as should be investigated. You can twist, turn and tell half truths but that doesn’t change what I said and really…you’re better than this? Why would you for any reason desire our government to be able to use the full power of our intelligence agencies to be used as a political weapon for one side or the other? It would destroy our country. Do you really not see just how dangerous this is? My gosh…

Barr has already said he will release the report, at least the parts of it he can release legally, sorry he’s not going to break the law for you.

He will be breaking the law if he defies the subpoenas of the house judiciary and house intelligence committees…

1 Like

The house can’t force someone to violate the law. Sorry

Please cite the law you are referring to.

The law specifically allows these committees access to the report… congress wrote these laws for their benefit…

Section e

easy peasy lemon squeezey

lets see it. release the report.

free the 400!

Allan

Congress orders an investigation, I say they should see the results and you say stuff like that :point_up_2:

Cigarette?

1 Like

Then the full report should be released, un-redacted, right?

Several posters here are arguing that a redacted copy should be released, as there may be other on-going investigations.

What investigations? Maybe you need to correct them as well.

The number of years will continue to increase as the CEC pushes their agenda further. Soon, Mueller will have investigated Trump for 12 years and didn’t find anything.

1 Like

Nope, Barr should follow the law and longstanding DOJ guidelines, which means redactions assuming there is grand jury testimony and findings about people who weren’t subsequently charged. If the house wants more than that, talk to a judge.

I heard it was 20 years…

Facts? As in report facts? You’ve seen the report already?

Destroy our country? Hyperbole much?

These are our employees. Not Kings and Queens. I don’t know about you, but I want more transparency from our government, not less. We have a right to know what was uncovered during the course of the investigation. And let the chips fall where they may.

1 Like

No, you don’t have a right to classified material, to information about people not charged or to grand jury testimony, sorry.

Total exoneration is already the flavor du juor. When the wording says literally the exact opposite. Alternate reality is more comfortable apparently. And the CEC thrives on this intellectual laziness.

1 Like

So, basically the exact opposite of what happened with Clinton just months before the election.

Gotcha.

Here’s what happened:

Mueller released the report and Barr made a poor summary, but stated their was no collusion.
Trump supporters lined the streets, cheering and claiming Trump was exonerated for everything.
Congress says - We want to see the full report.
Trump and his supporters go - Sure! Nothing to hide. Collusion delusion!!
Congress says they’ll get subpoenas and go to court if necessary.
Trump changes his tune. - Re-opening this? How ridiculous!
Trump supporters now go - Libz are mad! They need to find something, anything! US under attack!

2 Likes

Remind me, didn’t democrats say what he did was totally out of line and that he should have been fired for it?