What is the definition of a baby boomer? What years?
Only military spending and money that goes to people they like stimulate the economy.
JayJay
147
I suppose Larry Tesler missed being a boomer by one year.
Boomers are generally 1946-1964 for birthdays.
Tesler was born in 1945.
Right? VE day wasn’t even a thing yet when he popped out. Just like boomers to taker credit from another generation
Got nothing in response ?it’s cool
Which when I used it proved me right and you wrong…funny that.
What percentage of boomers is it you think are working for the gov’t?
WuWei
154
You’re right, Tesler (RIP) was not a boomer. He sure as ■■■■ wasn’t a millennial. He was a lot closer to me than you.
I stand corrected.
JayJay
155
WHOOSH! Right over your head.
Who said he was a millennial? That is a weird link to make. But you have my hattip…some of the most active posters on this forum would not have done what you did
Tootles
WuWei
157
Nobody, but we know what you were getting at.
I hear from some places that we should raise the voting age because young people don’t know enough to vote.
Yet it’s the blue hairs who can’t get within 5 feet of a computer without getting a dozen viruses and giving away their life savings to a Nigerian prince . Maybe there should be an upper limit as well using that logic
3 Likes
Just had an extended stay with my MAGA family, and can concur from my observations: Internet scams, weird mailing lists, odd subscription services, and rightwing politics.
At this point, I wouldn’t be surprised if my parents called me, and told me they’d spent all their money on magic beans.
3 Likes
Feel free to provide relevant evidence disputing that so-called myth. 
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/07/10/we_dont_know_whether_perot_cost_bush_in_1992_140743.html
http://archive.fairvote.org/plurality/collection2.htm
In the Governor’s races, Perot’s voters cast 18% of their ballots for the Republican candidates; 56% of their ballots for Democratic candidates, 17% for independent candidates, and 8% did not bother to vote for Governor. If Perot’s voters had voted for Bush and Clinton in the same proportion that the voted for the Republican and Democratic candidates for Governor, Clinton’s lead would have increased by 7.5 million votes.
In the Senate races, Perot’s supporters voted 27% for the Republican candidates, 24% for the Democratic candidates, 23% for the independent candidates, and 24% skipped the Senate races entirely. (This does not include states that did not have Senate races.)
In the House races, Perot’s voters cast 22% of their ballots for Republican candidates, 19% for Democratic candidates, 18% for independent candidates, and 40% did not vote in House races.
I’d say you don’t have a myth, but rather an unprovable theory. Given your political persuasion, you’ll likely continue believing the theory.
