Dont be a revisionist. Only lib professors can do that.
My position was that US could achieve its defense objectives without being in NATO.
I provided fact after fact that proved that NATO is neither necessary nor sufficient to meet US objectives… that other means of agreements are possible with individual countries or whatever is left of NATO itself after we leave.
Libs disagreed. And now with Finland throwing your position the bird, you are all ready to say…“oh no… you misunderstood. We all were in agreement”
Says the person who cannot comprehend why there might be twelve people involved in hacking DNC servers. Thick with irony is a massive understatement lol.
I have neither an UZI nor a pig.
But I generally have agreed with zeitgeist so far. Kinda radical though so the possibility of fratricide keeps me somewhat distant. A few “likes” and some supportive posts are in order though.