Someone should investigate the correlation between the violence in Minneapolis, Chicago, Seattle and elsewhere and the wearing of masks. I remember reading about a study once. I think these people are emboldened by the fact their faces are covered and they can’t be identified.

1 Like

Welcome to the forum. Please make sure you read the rules posted in Community Feedback.

Perhaps if 99.9% of what is done by him was not inept and negligent then he wouldn’t face “99.5% negative coverage”.

2 Likes

A couple of things you may not know.

Covid19 spreads.

People can be contagious without showing signs of infection.

You are one of “my” citizens. I’m sorry I’m not one of yours.

3 Likes

And who’s the Judas sheep? The task force?

Taken your hydroxychloroquine today?

Inept. Unqualified. Disinterested.

Trump 2020 :us:

No one needs to prove him wrong. Reality already does that quite well.

Unlike most Trumpsters, I seek, respect and honor the truth. And do my best to spread as wide and far as I can. Sadly, most Trumpsters live on their own reality.

I choose to live in reality. Not the plane of existence most Trumpsters live in.

I do visit though…it can be both entertaining, and incredibly frightening at the same time.

How the heck is the President going to establish a nationwide mask requirement? These policies have to be enforced and there is no national police force available to enforce a mask requirement. That police power belongs to the states. What, use the FBI to enforce a national mask policy?

2 Likes

Quite an alternate reality you have going there.

Make
America
Glib
Again

Trump 2020 :us:

Now I remember why I usually scroll by your posts.

Thanks.

The 99.5 % negative coverage is because Trump is making a surprisingly good fist of dismantling the progress towards an authoritarian NWO takeover of the USA, a takeover the MSM largely supports.

1 Like

Did D Trump articulate that view in his interview with Fox News’s Chris Wallace?

I watched three minutes of Chris Wallace. That’s about two more minutes than he deserves. His MO was predictable.

I agree.
What kind of idiot would allow themselves to be interviewed by that guy?

1 Like

That’s certainly true. Not a bad theory. Welcome.

The one good thing you can say about Wallace is that he treats everyone like ■■■■■

He’s the most consistently abrasive reporter I’ve ever seen.

Too bad he didn’t learn anything from his father.

Wrong on China. Wrong on Iraq. Wrong strategy for boosting the economy. Wrong to recognise Jerusalem. Wrong to push forward with justice reform. Wrong to strengthen borders. Wrong to make NATO partners pay more of their share. Wrong to warm Germany about relying on Russian fuel…

If I close my eyes and stick my thumbs in my ears, I cannot almost see your point.

2 Likes