Treating women as equals

[bootz]

that is proof

[bootz]

he said they liked it because he was famous.

[bootz]

where do you find facts?

[bootz]

how many times have you been accused?

[bootz]

and what are the consequences for making ■■■■ up?

[Steel-W0LF]

@Excast

@bootz

rushing to judgement is what lynch mobs due, they decide guilt and execute, that is what your side does.

pity you cant see that.

Your side literally chants “Lock her up!” about a woman who has never even been charged with a crime. What we asked is that multiple credible claims of sexual misconduct, and the lies from the accused when confronted with the allegations, get a proper investigation. If that looks like a “lynch mob” to you…well we have very different interpretations of what that looks like.

I won’t comment on the other things Clinton was accused of. Because on those things you’re right. There really isn’t any evidence. But on the email issue she most certainly is guilty. People not wanting to prosecute is not the same as innocent. Each and every marked, partially marked, and unmarked classified email is a felony. And there were multiple.

It’s like being caught breaking the law but the DA not pressing charges. Guilt can be known as a fact but still not be deemed worth the trouble to prosecute. And while prosecuting Clinton would be legally justified over the emails. It would be a metric ton of political trouble.

[bootz]

Nobody was prosecuted during the 8 years Obama was in office, they covered for each other.

like arrest go down when the police are on strike.

[Excast]

@Steel-W0LF

I won’t comment on the other things Clinton was accused of. Because on those things you’re right. There really isn’t any evidence. But on the email issue she most certainly is guilty. People not wanting to prosecute is not the same as innocent. Each and every marked, partially marked, and unmarked classified email is a felony. And there were multiple.

It’s like being caught breaking the law but the DA not pressing charges. Guilt can be known as a fact but still not be deemed worth the trouble to prosecute. And while prosecuting Clinton would be legally justified over the emails. It would be a metric ton of political trouble.

And I would be fine with charging her had there been any real precedent for doing so. Instead, we had Clinton essentially engaging in the same sort of behavior that many of her predecessors on the right had to varying degrees, only it suddenly became a massive scandal when Republicans thought they could damage Obama and possibly eliminate the Democratic Presidential front runner.

[bootz]

That is ridiculous. even now the deniers deny.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@CanadianJudo

I always put my faith in the victim male or female.

Which is exactly why many play the victim.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

She has no shame… only a hatred for Trump and anything or anyone he stands behind.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@sikofit

@PocketAces

you make me sick personally, because you taint other women who actually are abused

No, she does not taint other women who are abused

I say she does.

[sikofit]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@sikofit

@PocketAces

you make me sick personally, because you taint other women who actually are abused

No, she does not taint other women who are abused

I say she does.

It’s weird how many of the people who say that tend to already have a record of not believing the victims brave enough to come forward

[Tguns]

@bootz

where do you find facts?

North of fiction right next to truth.

[bootz]

maybe they are not victims, did the Weinstein girls have no idea what they were doing. Did the girls not warn each other?

[sikofit]

@bootz

maybe they are not victims,

And there it is.

[bootz]

duke Lacrosse. clap

[koushi_shinigami]

@bootz

and what are the consequences for making ■■■■ up?

In my experience, not much.

[CoachMcGuirk]

@bootz

how many times have you been accused?

None times.
How 'bout you?

[bootz]

odd that Ford did not turn over any evidence to committee.