Treating women as equals

mobulis · 2018-10-04T19:53:55.654Z

Samm:

mobulis:

Samm:

It sounds like you are implying that all accusations of sexual assault should be automatically accepted as true because currently they are often discounted because that is the only evidence that an assault may have occurred.

Nope he’s asking why its only victim’s of sexual crimes that are automatically branded as liars.

But that is not even remotely true, therefore, it suggests that he is making an extreme statement toward the opposite position.

But it is true.

Samm · 2018-10-04T19:59:16.007Z

mobulis:

Samm:

mobulis:

Samm:

It sounds like you are implying that all accusations of sexual assault should be automatically accepted as true because currently they are often discounted because that is the only evidence that an assault may have occurred.

Nope he’s asking why its only victim’s of sexual crimes that are automatically branded as liars.

But that is not even remotely true, therefore, it suggests that he is making an extreme statement toward the opposite position.

But it is true.

Here is the statement: “it’s only the victims of sexual crimes that are automatically branded as liars.”

That must be why no man ever gets charged with sexual crimes, let alone gets convicted.

mobulis · 2018-10-04T20:13:11.440Z

Samm:

Here is the statement: “it’s only the victims of sexual crimes that are automatically branded as liars.”

That must be why no man ever gets charged with sexual crimes, let alone gets convicted.

And its a true statement.

Samm · 2018-10-04T20:32:57.734Z

mobulis:

Samm:

Here is the statement: “it’s only the victims of sexual crimes that are automatically branded as liars.”

That must be why no man ever gets charged with sexual crimes, let alone gets convicted.

And its a true statement.

Right. No man ever gets convicted of sexual crimes because nobody ever believes a woman who claims to have been sexually victimized.

Good job Mob.

AlexMcAlpine · 2018-10-04T21:08:17.472Z

sikofit:

No, she does not taint other women who are abused

She clearly does - as does every woman who accuses a man falsely because out of spite or because she’s pressured to do so by her family, etc.

WuWei · 2018-10-04T23:01:56.823Z

Sknyluv:

WuWei:

Sknyluv:

We should take all claims of sexual assault on face value,

What does that mean?

Only consider the fact of the case.

Are you sure that’s what “face value” means?

reflechissez · 2018-10-04T23:06:51.238Z

AlexMcAlpine:

sikofit:

No, she does not taint other women who are abused

She clearly does - as does every woman who accuses a man falsely because out of spite or because she’s pressured to do so by her family, etc.

The only people who’s individual behavior does NOT taint others is a male, white, heterosexual Christian.

WuWei · 2018-10-05T01:02:14.780Z

Why would a woman want to be equal to a man?

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-05T01:15:42.114Z

mobulis:

Samm:

It sounds like you are implying that all accusations of sexual assault should be automatically accepted as true because currently they are often discounted because that is the only evidence that an assault may have occurred.

Nope he’s asking why its only victim’s of sexual crimes that are automatically branded as liars.

Many have proven to be. We hear about only a few who have been found out after thousands of dollars and investigations. But how many men can afford that?

Ask Emmett Till.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-05T01:33:17.656Z

WuWei:

Why would a woman want to be equal to a man?

How else can she win a pissing contest?

WuWei · 2018-10-05T01:42:33.849Z

No need to be crude.

mobulis · 2018-10-05T04:52:21.138Z

WuWei:

Why would a woman want to be equal to a man?

Amazing…

WuWei · 2018-10-05T17:38:42.447Z

mobulis:

WuWei:

Why would a woman want to be equal to a man?

Amazing…

Why is that?

Samm · 2018-10-06T09:59:16.532Z

WuWei:

mobulis:

WuWei:

Why would a woman want to be equal to a man?

Amazing…

Why is that?

Because it is, man.

calirepub · 2018-10-06T10:21:51.356Z

Samm:

Do you mean like Merrick Garland?

Republicans should have found a reason to reject Garland, instead of just saying that black presidents are only entitled to half of their supreme court nominees.

WuWei · 2018-10-06T14:07:43.818Z

calirepub:

Samm:

Do you mean like Merrick Garland?

Republicans should have found a reason to reject Garland, instead of just saying that black presidents are only entitled to half of their supreme court nominees.

So they should have Kavanaughed him? Really?

coolidge · 2018-10-06T14:14:37.473Z

Really? Who said that? We just thought since Biden made a statement about voters should be able to pick the justice, it would be seen as Republicans being bipartisan. What a better time to tell Biden, yeah we agree?

calirepub · 2018-10-06T14:38:48.451Z

coolidge:

Really? Who said that? We just thought since Biden made a statement about voters should be able to pick the justice, it would be seen as Republicans being bipartisan. What a better time to tell Biden, yeah we agree?

Articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.

Samm · 2018-10-06T20:51:46.939Z

calirepub:

Samm:

Do you mean like Merrick Garland?

Republicans should have found a reason to reject Garland, instead of just saying that black presidents are only entitled to half of their supreme court nominees.

You are right, the Republicans should have given him due consideration (however, Obama being black had absolutely nothing to do with it.) What does that have to do with him being a white man just like Kavanaugh is?

Samson_Corwell · 2018-10-09T04:30:59.156Z

Roxiebelle:

It’s harsh but true, it is sickening because in this case it’s all political.

Why is that sickening? It couldn’t ever be apolitical.