Top U.S. Ukraine official who heard Trump phone call to testify Tues in defiance of WH

Indeed. Propaganda works!

ETA: The Epoch Times has spent more than $1,500,000 in the last six months on over 11,000 Pro-Trump advertisements.

By the numbers, there is no bigger advocate of President Donald Trump on Facebook than The Epoch Times.

The small New York-based nonprofit news outlet has spent more than $1.5 million on about 11,000 pro-Trump advertisements in the last six months, according to data from Facebook’s advertising archive — more than any organization outside of the Trump campaign itself, and more than most Democratic presidential candidates have spent on their own campaigns.

1 Like

Yes. The “simpatico with Ukraine” comment is unnecessary because they give no evidence it’s true. Why include it at all if you aren’t going to support it?

Someone is in front of the tv this morning…

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1189167309455331328?s=21

He is the WH expert on Ukraine.

sympatico Play sym·pa·tico
adjective

The definition of sympatico is getting along and having mutual understanding with another. Also spelled simpatico.

https://mobile.twitter.com/AlexNBCNews/status/1189168892712816640

Vindman just arrived to testify.

So this guy has first hand knowledge

It will be interesting whether or not his testimony of what was said, strictly concurs with the transcript that’s being reported as what was said? If there’s a dispute, I’d tend to believe this officer more than the transcript.

What the White House released is not a transcript…

2 Likes

I’ll wait to hear what he says. But what the WH released is not really a transcript anyway

1 Like

Sure thing Trump, because you’ve never been known to say anything inappropriate.

Yep, first hand knowledge and was concerned enough to report it immediately.

1 Like

And let’s all remember that he is a decorated officer who was thoroughly vetted for this job, unlike Rudy and the GOP senators and Congresspeople and Fox News guests who are smearing him.

2 Likes

So far his statement doesn’t contradict the transcript. In fact he says "and we all know what was said ", concerning the transcript, which pretty much confirms the transcript. The rest appear to be his opinion, which he is entitled to.

Good point. Further supported by the fact that it was a memo, not transcript.

2 Likes

They have morphed into a global government dependent entity.

Government can also be all failing and all powerful.

:newspaper:

We still haven’t seen a transcript, no matter how many times you say otherwise.

1 Like

Maybe the translation material is in a SCIF down by the Potomac.

:lock_with_ink_pen:

You know that we know where it was, we just haven’t seen it, right?

Okay, released memo. This guy was supposedly in on the call. He says in his statement, “we all know what was said”. Seems to me if the released memo, which is obviously what he was talking about, contradicted the phone call he would say so.