Time has named the Public servant who has sworn under oath agasint the President and possible corruption as Guardians of the Year. well the President and his support views this people as Traitors.
For more than two months, the magazine said, the president “attacked the public servants as ‘traitors’ and ‘human scum.’” And in September, at the US Mission to the United Nations, he “suggested the proper response to the whistle-blower’s complaint was the punishment historically reserved for ‘spies’ and for ‘treason’: the death penalty.”
It’s an eye of the beholder moment. Finding the notion of someone being nonpartisan funny would imply one is deeply entrenched in “party before country”.
Were not talking about those people who believed every negative piece of gossip they heard, whether it came from inside Sondland’s head or somewhere else out of the air, and spread it amongst each other like the proverbial fishwives, are we? You know, the ones that were furious that they were out of the loop.
Oh, well if times says so it must be true.
And whom did they name as person of the year, then? Some great scientist who developed a cure for cancer?
These were the same people calling Obama the Democrat’s “messiah”… now look at these same people worshiping a draft dodging, cheating New York real-estate mogul that was born into wealth.
Again, as with the FISA report, you aren’t keeping up. Tell me where Sondland heard from Trump that the funds were being held up as a quid pro quo for an investigation, or an announcement of an investigation. Lets see the quote.
And yet Taylor got his story from Sondland.
You do know that saying the words quid pro quo is not actually required for their to be one right? Please dont tell me thats the angle you’re going with. That Trump never said the words quid pro quo
Why not? Horowitz spent his time looking through documents for somebody to write down “we did this because of our political bias against Trump” in order to determine the existence of bias.
