Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.
You compared life for a life
Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.
You compared life for a life
So penance and rehabilitation is not possible? Learning from mistakes? What’s the recidivism rate for a criminal who once took a life? (It’s the lowest of any crime by leaps and bounds)
Speak to this case, not in generics.
Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.
You compared life for a life
Do you have information that no one else does?
FreeAndClear:
Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.
You compared life for a life
Do you have information that no one else does?
You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?
FreeAndClear:
So penance and rehabilitation is not possible? Learning from mistakes? What’s the recidivism rate for a criminal who once took a life? (It’s the lowest of any crime by leaps and bounds)
Speak to this case, not in generics.
No this conversation is about punishment in general to me.
You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?
Well it was a crime of emotion
I’ll ask again. Do you have information no one else has?
I’ll ask again. Do you have information no one else has?
No, but the prosecutors do.
I think that’s his point.
No this conversation is about punishment in general to me.
Well then. Start a thread. You’ve been replying to this specific case.
Who would have known when you reply to a specific case that you mean “in general”. ![]()
No, but the prosecutors do.
I think that’s his point.
No. it really isn’t. It’s reaching.
FreeAndClear:
You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?
FreeAndClear:
Well it was a crime of emotion
I’ll ask again. Do you have information no one else has?
Prosecutors said Pazienza crossed West 28th Street and Eighth Avenue at around 8:30 p.m. the night of the shove and called the elderly woman a “bitch” — before pushing her to the pavement “without provocation.”
No. it really isn’t. It’s reaching.
She was charged with manslaughter, not murder - based on the evidence that the prosecutors have, but we do not.
Okay. Is that something you are privy to?
'Cause I read that, too.
Where do you get our information that it was a crime of emotion?
Well it was a crime of emotion
Where do you get our information that it was a crime of emotion?
What else would it be?
She was charged with manslaughter, not murder - based on the evidence that the prosecutors have, but we do not.
Thanks. I read that, too.
IMO, she is undercharged. But, hey. It is NYC so it is to be expected.
Okay. Is that something you are privy to?
'Cause I read that, too.
Where do you get our information that it was a crime of emotion?
FreeAndClear:
Well it was a crime of emotion
Yes i am basing it on her pushing someone and calling them a bitch.
I don’t understand what is exactly your point that let’s say i am wrong, which is of course entirely possible, what’s your counter. That you don’t know yet what kind of crime it was? Does the manslaughter charge say anything about the crime?
IMO, she is undercharged. But, hey. It is NYC so it is to be expected.
![]()
If there was any evidence that it was murder - that she planned it, or intended to kill her - I can assure you that she would have been charged with murder.
I don’t think you understand how this story is playing out in New York.
DMK:
FreeAndClear:
Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.
You compared life for a life
Do you have information that no one else does?
You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?
Maybe, we don’t have ALL of the info the authorities have.
TheDoctorIsIn:
She was charged with manslaughter, not murder - based on the evidence that the prosecutors have, but we do not.
Thanks. I read that, too.
IMO, she is undercharged. But, hey. It is NYC so it is to be expected.
For a Long Island woman? I dunno about that. That’s what prosecutors in ny either call examples or socielites
FreeAndClear:
DMK:
FreeAndClear:
Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.
You compared life for a life
Do you have information that no one else does?
You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?
Maybe, we don’t have ALL of the info the authorities have.
I agree. I don’t believe it was her intent to kill if it were then it’s murder of course otherwise i don’t understand the need (not yours) to send her away for life.
What else would it be?
I couldn’t care less about emotions. I care that a woman is dead due to the intentional, malicious actions of the woman who killed her.
Hannity Community
The official community forum of Sean Hannity. Join the conversation with fellow conservatives on the issues that matter most.