Thug Culture State of Mind

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

Where did i measure them against each other?

Are we to completely rid ourselves of prosecution for crimes of passion because all life is important?

Where do you see this as a crime of passion?

Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.

You compared life for a life

[DMK]

@FreeAndClear

So penance and rehabilitation is not possible? Learning from mistakes? What’s the recidivism rate for a criminal who once took a life? (It’s the lowest of any crime by leaps and bounds)

Speak to this case, not in generics.

[DMK]

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.

You compared life for a life

Do you have information that no one else does?

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.

You compared life for a life

Do you have information that no one else does?

You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

So penance and rehabilitation is not possible? Learning from mistakes? What’s the recidivism rate for a criminal who once took a life? (It’s the lowest of any crime by leaps and bounds)

Speak to this case, not in generics.

No this conversation is about punishment in general to me.

[DMK]

@FreeAndClear

You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion

I’ll ask again. Do you have information no one else has?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DMK

I’ll ask again. Do you have information no one else has?

No, but the prosecutors do.

I think that’s his point.

[DMK]

@FreeAndClear

No this conversation is about punishment in general to me.

Well then. Start a thread. You’ve been replying to this specific case.

Who would have known when you reply to a specific case that you mean “in general”.

[DMK]

@TheDoctorIsIn

No, but the prosecutors do.

I think that’s his point.

No. it really isn’t. It’s reaching.

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion

I’ll ask again. Do you have information no one else has?

Prosecutors said Pazienza crossed West 28th Street and Eighth Avenue at around 8:30 p.m. the night of the shove and called the elderly woman a “bitch” — before pushing her to the pavement “without provocation.”

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DMK

No. it really isn’t. It’s reaching.

She was charged with manslaughter, not murder - based on the evidence that the prosecutors have, but we do not.

[DMK]

Okay. Is that something you are privy to?

'Cause I read that, too.

Where do you get our information that it was a crime of emotion?

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DMK

Where do you get our information that it was a crime of emotion?

What else would it be?

[DMK]

@TheDoctorIsIn

She was charged with manslaughter, not murder - based on the evidence that the prosecutors have, but we do not.

Thanks. I read that, too.

IMO, she is undercharged. But, hey. It is NYC so it is to be expected.

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

Okay. Is that something you are privy to?

'Cause I read that, too.

Where do you get our information that it was a crime of emotion?

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion

Yes i am basing it on her pushing someone and calling them a bitch.

I don’t understand what is exactly your point that let’s say i am wrong, which is of course entirely possible, what’s your counter. That you don’t know yet what kind of crime it was? Does the manslaughter charge say anything about the crime?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DMK

IMO, she is undercharged. But, hey. It is NYC so it is to be expected.

If there was any evidence that it was murder - that she planned it, or intended to kill her - I can assure you that she would have been charged with murder.

I don’t think you understand how this story is playing out in New York.

[Striker840]

@FreeAndClear

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.

You compared life for a life

Do you have information that no one else does?

You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?

Maybe, we don’t have ALL of the info the authorities have.

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@TheDoctorIsIn

She was charged with manslaughter, not murder - based on the evidence that the prosecutors have, but we do not.

Thanks. I read that, too.

IMO, she is undercharged. But, hey. It is NYC so it is to be expected.

For a Long Island woman? I dunno about that. That’s what prosecutors in ny either call examples or socielites

[FreeAndClear]

@Striker840

@FreeAndClear

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

Well it was a crime of emotion but that’s not the point.

You compared life for a life

Do you have information that no one else does?

You have it too. She was charged with manslaughter. Is that an undercharge?

Maybe, we don’t have ALL of the info the authorities have.

I agree. I don’t believe it was her intent to kill if it were then it’s murder of course otherwise i don’t understand the need (not yours) to send her away for life.

[DMK]

@TheDoctorIsIn

What else would it be?

I couldn’t care less about emotions. I care that a woman is dead due to the intentional, malicious actions of the woman who killed her.