Three illegal immigration lies

altair1013 · 2019-05-01T14:44:34.715Z

Eagle-Keeper:

Could you explain just what then is the Democrats plan to deal with the massive influx of migrants pouring across our Southern border? Also what is their plan to deal with illegal immigration?

That’s what I am trying to drill down to. So far nothing. All I get are libs expressing their disappointment in me. The democratic thinking seems to be that 100,000 border crashers per month is not too many. And if even more come in, they are welcome. In fact there is no upper limit to the numbers that we will be willing to absorb. If the democrats are suggesting that we cannot take in as many as want to come, I would like to see it.

mobulis · 2019-05-01T15:00:58.311Z

altair1013:

Eagle-Keeper:

Could you explain just what then is the Democrats plan to deal with the massive influx of migrants pouring across our Southern border? Also what is their plan to deal with illegal immigration?

That’s what I am trying to drill down to. So far nothing. All I get are libs expressing their disappointment in me. The democratic thinking seems to be that 100,000 border crashers per month is not too many. And if even more come in, they are welcome. In fact there is no upper limit to the numbers that we will be willing to absorb. If the democrats are suggesting that we cannot take in as many as want to come, I would like to see it.

So your just going to ignore kingarthur65’s post. Got it.

altair1013 · 2019-05-01T15:19:20.680Z

kingarthur65:

You can start with the Senate Immigration Reform bill of 2013.
What do you think should be done?

It’s a decent start. 700 miles of border fencing is a good idea as long as it’s an actual formidable barrier. Not simply a glorified chain link fence. Do you think that this bill has any hope in the house? Most of the presidential candidates have pledged not to add any additional barriers. Some have pledged to tear down existing ones. Nancy has offered $1.00 to fund barriers. So where does it go from here?

Eagle-Keeper · 2019-05-01T15:22:25.700Z

kingarthur65:

You can start with the Senate Immigration Reform bill of 2013.
What do you think should be done?

There were many things that regarding that legislation that Republicans didn’t like:

The Heritage Foundation

The Senate’s Comprehensive Immigration Bill: Top 10 Concerns

The United States is—by far—the world’s leading destination for immigrants.[1] More than any other nation in history, the United States has made itself a welcome home for immigrants in search of a better life. Over the past several decades, however,...

Now to be clear both parties have failed on this issue. Regarding what I think should be done is not really relevant since I have no power to propose any legislative fix. All that can be discussed is what if anything is being put up now by our Representatives.

reflechissez · 2019-05-01T15:30:06.718Z

Eagle-Keeper:

kingarthur65:

You can start with the Senate Immigration Reform bill of 2013.
What do you think should be done?

There were many things that regarding that legislation that Republicans didn’t like:

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/report/the-senates-comprehensive-immigration-bill-top-10-concerns

Now to be clear both parties have failed on this issue. Regarding what I think should be done is not really relevant since I have no power to propose any legislative fix. All that can be discussed is what if anything is being put up now by our Representatives.

convenient cop out.

altair1013 · 2019-05-01T15:32:48.375Z

reflechissez:

convenient cop out.

How about this one?

It’s a decent start. 700 miles of border fencing is a good idea as long as it’s an actual formidable barrier. Not simply a glorified chain link fence. Do you think that this bill has any hope in the house? Most of the presidential candidates have pledged not to add any additional barriers. Some have pledged to tear down existing ones. Nancy has offered $1.00 to fund barriers. So where does it go from here?

Eagle-Keeper · 2019-05-01T15:37:16.310Z

reflechissez:

All that can be discussed is what if anything is being put up now by our Representatives.

convenient cop out.

It’s true. Personally I don’t see what’s the point of me and you or whoever going back and forth on what one of us thinks should be done. The question is who in Congress is currently proposing legislation to fix this complete mess?

reflechissez · 2019-05-01T15:39:45.534Z

your opinion is not the truth. you do a lot of “back and forth” about education.

altair1013 · 2019-05-01T15:43:20.312Z

reflechissez:

your opinion is not the truth. you do a lot of “back and forth” about education.

You going to ignore my question?

adroit · 2019-05-01T15:53:42.594Z

Mountain_Soldier:

But it’s not a crime.

Otherwise illegal immigrants would have criminal records.

It is and many do.

kingarthur65 · 2019-05-01T15:58:13.295Z

altair1013:

You can start with the Senate Immigration Reform bill of 2013.
What do you think should be done?

It’s a decent start. 700 miles of border fencing is a good idea as long as it’s an actual formidable barrier. Not simply a glorified chain link fence. Do you think that this bill has any hope in the house? Most of the presidential candidates have pledged not to add any additional barriers. Some have pledged to tear down existing ones. Nancy has offered $1.00 to fund barriers. So where does it go from here?

This comprehensive immigration reform bill was negotiated by the bipartisan gang of 8. There was give and take on both sides and this was and is a good example of compromise on both sides.

It’s very telling that the only part of interest to you is additional barriers. The bill also provides funding for additional judges and border patrol agents, which would better address the problems we are seeing at the border today.

The singular idea of building a wall does very little to address the problems we are seeing today. Trump has received funding for expanding barriers each year of his presidency. He hasn’t spent the funds he received in 2017 yet. I think the country would be better served to hire more judges and agents. It would have a more immediate impact. A wall will take years to build and have any impact.

altair1013 · 2019-05-01T16:02:39.107Z

This question remains:

Do you think that this bill has any hope in the house? Most of the presidential candidates have pledged not to add any additional barriers. Some have pledged to tear down existing ones. Nancy has offered $1.00 to fund barriers. So where does it go from here?

kingarthur65 · 2019-05-01T16:08:08.395Z

altair1013:

This question remains:

Do you think that this bill has any hope in the house? Most of the presidential candidates have pledged not to add any additional barriers. Some have pledged to tear down existing ones. Nancy has offered $1.00 to fund barriers. So where does it go from here?

As this bill is currently written? I doubt it, but it is a good starting point for compromise. Which is what I suggested to begin with.

Nancy offered $1 after Trump was already offered $1B. Then Trump wanted $5B. Then Congress approved $1B, ending the shutdown.

Mountain_Soldier · 2019-05-01T16:10:03.400Z

I thought it was a civil issue and not a criminal one?

altair1013 · 2019-05-01T16:11:34.002Z

kingarthur65:

As this bill is currently written? I doubt it, but it is a good starting point for compromise. Which is what I suggested to begin with.

Nancy offered $1 after Trump was already offered $1B. Then Trump wanted $5B. Then Congress approved $1B, ending the shutdown.

Agreed. None of the presidential candidates will be in favor of 700 miles of new barrier. That would be an admission that we have a serious problem on the border. They are not prepared to go there. This bill will offer nothing to republicans after they are done tinkering with it.

kingarthur65 · 2019-05-01T16:25:25.874Z

altair1013:

As this bill is currently written? I doubt it, but it is a good starting point for compromise. Which is what I suggested to begin with.

Nancy offered $1 after Trump was already offered $1B. Then Trump wanted $5B. Then Congress approved $1B, ending the shutdown.

Agreed. None of the presidential candidates will be in favor of 700 miles of new barrier. That would be an admission that we have a serious problem on the border. They are not prepared to go there. This bill will offer nothing to republicans after they are done tinkering with it.

Your singular focus on a wall, while not surprising, does not address the problems we are currently experiencing at the southern border.

altair1013 · 2019-05-01T16:45:53.766Z

kingarthur65:

Your singular focus on a wall, while not surprising, does not address the problems we are currently experiencing at the southern border.

You are mistaken. I’m not the one who will be shooting this bill down because it funds a barrier. It has absolutely zero to do with me. You need to come to terms with this fact.

adroit · 2019-05-01T16:46:22.427Z

Mountain_Soldier:

I thought it was a civil issue and not a criminal one?

Illegal presence (being here undocumented) is a civil matter.
Illegal entry (the initial act of crossing the border) between ports of entry is a crime.

WuWei · 2019-05-01T16:48:40.994Z

reflechissez:

convenient cop out.

Correct it.

kingarthur65 · 2019-05-01T16:54:10.139Z

altair1013:

Your singular focus on a wall, while not surprising, does not address the problems we are currently experiencing at the southern border.

You are mistaken. I’m not the one who will be shooting this bill down because it funds a barrier. It has absolutely zero to do with me. You need to come to terms with this fact.

Is a wall the only way to address problems at the border? Is it even the best way to address the current problems?