It’s NOT not OK because of Barr’s opinion. It’s not OK because it inserts the executive branch into the judicial process in individual cases. By all accounts except the CEC, that’s just not done. Ever. Obama didn’t do it, Bush didn’t do it, Clinton didn’t do it. Neither did any of their attorneys general, including William Barr before he hooked up with Donald Trump.

If you want to believe that Barr took this step without direction from Trump, a step he apparently hasn’t taken in the hundreds if not thousands of cases handled by the DOJ since he assumed the AG position, that’s OK. I guess it’s the sort of thing that Trump supporters need to believe to continue to support him.

The sentencing recommendation is not remotely the “judicial process”, it is now and has always been squarely a DOJ process.

1 Like

Yes. By all means, let’s not focus on the fact that Presidents and AG’s simply DO NOT DO THIS. Let’s get hung up on semantics. :roll_eyes:

Or we can focus on it’s not being illegal, within the scope of AG’s authority and remind the left, they lost the election and do not get to dictate how Trump governs.

You know what else Presidents had never ever done before? Allow me to list a few that were definite firsts in the last administration.

Ordering the murder of four US citizens without due process.
Giving guns to drug cartels, without bothering to track them.
Rewriting immigration law to grant immunity to illegal aliens.

To name just a few.

2 Likes

When in doubt, whatabout. I admire your persistence.

no its not, its over 2500

https://medium.com/@dojalumni/doj-alumni-statement-on-the-events-surrounding-the-sentencing-of-roger-stone-c2cb75ae4937

1 Like

Political grandstanding, they have no power and no consituency.

They do have a constituency. Millions of Americans that still believe in the rule of law, which basically excludes most Trump supporters.

1 Like

Horse hockey. They aren’t elected and they aren’t running for any office, they have no constituency. Not one person in a thousand is even talking about them.

at least 25 people are so…wrong again

1 Like

OK use that number if you like, 2,500 out of how many?

When in doubt whatabout

Exactly.

Also, @WildRose constituency has more than one definition. The one I was referring to was this…

image

1 Like

We don’t speak British English in the US. Keep grasping at those straws.

“Britain English” :rofl::joy::+1:

2 Likes

Are you not aware of the differences? Colour me shocked.

1 Like

:joy::rofl::+1: hahaha!

:rofl:

Wait…are you being serious? You didn’t actually know that constituency had more than one meaning?

Bwahahahahahaha!!!

You seem amused. No idea why.

from Welcome to Macmillan Education Customer Support

Sometimes, there is a difference between American English and British English.

Fortunately, Macmillan English Dictionary gives comprehensive information about both British English and American English. If you select British English as your default setting, you will see entries which use British spelling and show British pronunciation. Similarly, if you choose American English as your default setting, you will see entries which use American spelling and show American pronunciation.

You can switch from British English to American English and vice versa using the link at the end of each entry. Some definitions may also contain a brief comment about the difference between American English and British English uses of the word.

If you could actually read what was posted instead of making it up as you go along it would be helpful.

image