Actually, it was a the lenders who lobbied for the laws to change in 1997 that made bankruptcy ineligible for student loans. Right after Sallie Mae was privatized to a for-profit corporation. What a coincidence!
If the loan is able to be removed by bankruptcy, then the degree that loan paid for needs to be revokable.
True that you can’t make the students unlearn something, but removing the accreditation would eliminate a lot of the benefit of having the degree and why should you keep it if you didn’t pay for it.
If they don’t have the income to pay the loans, they’re not going to pay the loans. Do you think they will starve and live in the street so the bank can have their money?
Look, I’m not against loaning people money if you want. I am against a predatory system that relies on the government not allowing bankruptcy for one specific type of loan. Every other loan can be removed in bankruptcy, but not student loans. The lenders don’t have to worry about repayment because the debtor can never get out from under the debt.
Did you know that the price of a cosmetology degree is $30,000? Just 17 years about it was $4,000. This is for a job that pays $12 an hour. There going to be a shortage in the next few years too.
Why is making all debts equal to each other a bad idea? This is a problem Republicans caused in 1997 and 2005 when they outlawed bankruptcy for student loans.