This is not how the First Amendment works

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

No, they weren’t. They were free to buy any cupcakes in the shop.

And Black people were free to use any toilet they wanted… as long as there was a sign that said “Negro”.

I know, I was there. So what?

[TommyLucchese]

@altair1013

Good Luck with that! We’re running on policy.

Sure you are. Lol. You don’t even know what your policies are anymore besides firing Mexicans into the sun.

[TommyLucchese]

@Paul_Thomson

Where did he propose that?

He outright said it in a tweet, ironically. Do you guys not even bother to find out what’s going on before you start defending him anymore?

[hwyflier]

@Paul_Thomson

If I were a genius mastermind seeking to out-manoeuvre a far more numerous bunch of self-assessed evil geniuses, I would feign flaws that would induce my adversaries to underestimate my abilities and to buy me time to undermine them…

But since you said “if” let’s assume your not. That leaves this post with nothing but fantasy.

[kingarthur65]

@TommyLucchese

@altair1013

Good Luck with that! We’re running on policy.

Sure you are. Lol. You don’t even know what your policies are anymore besides firing Mexicans into the sun.

Today’s policies seem to promote big government, more regulations, pick winners and losers in the business community.
Or it could be defined as: Defend Trump at all costs even when he contradicts long held policy of the party.

[RTchoke]

@Sknyluv

@markdido

@Scratch

Did they stop him Tweeting or just add a link to fact check him?

Who checks the fact checkers?

Snopes and Politifact are the two biggest fact checkers in the country and they’re both in the tank for Democrats.

Was Twitter wrong in this case?

Their new little “fact-checker” is as biased as the day is long. Just like the majority of “fact checkers” out there.

Hell, you have these new little FB “fact checkers” pulling stuff on FB calling it untrue that has come directly from the CDC website. It doesn’t fit their narrative at the time so they call it false.

These “fact checkers” are anything but. They are biased little ■■■■■ sitting in their rooms censoring things they don’t like. That is all they are.

[Sknyluv]

@RTchoke

Their new little “fact-checker” is as biased as the day is long. Just like the majority of “fact checkers” out there.

Hell, you have these new little FB “fact checkers” pulling stuff on FB calling it untrue that has come directly from the CDC website. It doesn’t fit their narrative at the time so they call it false.

These “fact checkers” are anything but. They are biased little ■■■■■ sitting in their rooms censoring things they don’t like. That is all they are.

That was a lot of word to not even answer the question.

[WuWei]

@Sknyluv

@RTchoke

Their new little “fact-checker” is as biased as the day is long. Just like the majority of “fact checkers” out there.

Hell, you have these new little FB “fact checkers” pulling stuff on FB calling it untrue that has come directly from the CDC website. It doesn’t fit their narrative at the time so they call it false.

These “fact checkers” are anything but. They are biased little ■■■■■ sitting in their rooms censoring things they don’t like. That is all they are.

That was a lot of word to not even answer the question.

It answered the question.

[RTchoke]

I wasn’t answering a question.

Just pontificating my derision of so called “fact checkers”.

[RTchoke]

@WuWei

@Sknyluv

@RTchoke

Their new little “fact-checker” is as biased as the day is long. Just like the majority of “fact checkers” out there.

Hell, you have these new little FB “fact checkers” pulling stuff on FB calling it untrue that has come directly from the CDC website. It doesn’t fit their narrative at the time so they call it false.

These “fact checkers” are anything but. They are biased little ■■■■■ sitting in their rooms censoring things they don’t like. That is all they are.

That was a lot of word to not even answer the question.

It answered the question.

I suppose so in a way. I just have no love for fact checkers.

They are anything but.

Also, this guy they chose? PPfffffttt. Yeah, he’s a ■■■■■■■ peach.

[Auto129]

I love seeing the blue checkmarks rage impotently at this new feature.

Twitter needs to have a full-time team of fact checkers ready to go.

[Toll_Collector]

@hwyflier

Twitter added a fact-check link to Trump’s tweets about mail-in balloting. Trump, says he won’t allow it. Well good luck.

We see this misconception a lot of from confused people.

So here it is again in easy to understand cartoon form:

This is very true. I just can’t seem to remember anyone posting that very helpful little cartoon when Colin Kaepernick was doing his little thing. But it applies to him too, along with the door.

[toreyj01]

@Smyrna

@ImRightYoureWrong

Actually he’s been given more leeway

Oh…who else is being “fact checked”?

Anyone else would have been permabanned by now.

[toreyj01]

@Paul_Thomson

Remove public square status and designate them publishers?
Get FISA warrants to spy on internet platforms that have political and financial links to China?
Reveal the political and financial links between internet platform lords’ and the Chinese Communist Party?
Declare China an enemy of the United States, and make collusion with them a treasonous act?

If you make them publishers, that means they are responsible for every tweet. Trump would not like that in the least. They would have free reign to delete anything provably false.

[DougBH]

@ImRightYoureWrong

Twitter isn’t a phone service

And yet, it wants to claim it is only a carrier and not responsible for the content of its users…except at other times it seems its not a carrier and gets to control the content. Depending on what benefits it at the time.

[Auto129]

The website we’re posting on right now:

User Materials

iHeartMedia does not control and is not responsible for any notes, messages, billboard postings, ideas, suggestions, concepts or other material, or files delivered to iHeartMedia by you or other users (collectively, “User Materials”). iHeartMedia is not obligated to and does not regularly review, prescreen, monitor, delete, or edit User Materials.

However, iHeartMedia reserves the right to do so at any time in its sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, and to refuse, delete, move or edit any User Materials, in whole or in part, with or without notice.

iHeartMedia is not responsible or liable for damages of any kind arising from any User Materials even when iHeartMedia is advised of the possibility of such damages, or from iHeartMedia’s alteration or deletion of any User Materials.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@DougBH

And yet, it wants to claim it is only a carrier and not responsible for the content of its users…except at other times it seems its not a carrier and gets to control the content. Depending on what benefits it at the time.

No one is making the argument that Twitter is a “carrier”, or any way equivalent to the phone company.

The law is pretty clear:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

[Bigjohn]

If its good enough for iHeartMedia its good enough for Twiter

[highroller]

The thing is that Republicans are not for the US constitution or rule of law. I learned this two years ago when they passed laws in our state in direct violation of our constitution. They also used methods to adopt laws and amend them not described anywhere in the Michigan constitution.

So, really, they do not believe in anything but POWER. That means that the Republican party is not a conservative party; they are radicals.

[Bigjohn]

I would suggest, with the possible exception of the libertarians, no party fully accept all of the elements of the Constitution no mater what they say to their base