Lolz. Yeah sure thing
It doesn’t matter if he is the official recorder. Hearsay is any out of court statement. What the stenographer says is hearsay.
Let’s say this is 100% true (doubtful), how does that affect the abuse of power of the president?
Doesn’t change the fact that the POTUS asked a foreign government to investigate a political rival.
1 Like
You should probably look up Solomon’s record on Comeys imminent indictment before you pin your hopes on him.
1 Like
Let’s start with the obvious:
#FakeNews. You were lied to about this. We had a long thread about it:
and the ICIG came right out and debunked this lie.
Impeachment inquiry IS the investigation. Why does this need to be explained? Do we need to explain exactly what “impeachment” is again?
No, they don’t. Your article is titled: “Former CIA officer questions whether second whistleblower also has political bias.”
A guy not even in intelligence any longer made a guess about something he can’t possibly know.
Pretty desperate talking points.
The entire narrative has smelled fishy from the wide eyed Pelosi announcement forward.
One would expect the charges to have solid probable cause and evidence to move forward.
Instead it is more fishing for cause and outrageous innuendo with no connection to any charge.
ADDITIONALLY…the conduct of Hunter Biden and most likely VP Joe Biden is heavy with evidence of corruption and payoff.
The D are genuinely off their rockers.
2 Likes
This is why a VOTE in Congress is needed.
The disparity on the ownership of TRUTH is rather considerable.
No we don’t need a vote. If Trump has nothing to hide and the call was perfect then they should not have any problem letting officials testify and releasing any documentation requested on the matter so that we can clear him as quickly as possible. Don’t you agree?
1 Like
Pelosi rushed in before she had the appropriate probable cause.
She looks rather foolish right now.
A vote would justify her action.
She doesn’t need a vote to investigate. That is not required.
If Trump has nothing to hide and the call was perfect then they should not have any problem letting officials testify and releasing any documentation requested on the matter so that we can clear him as quickly as possible. Don’t you agree?
1 Like
then she should also have no problem with the GOP members calling witnesses to interview correct?
Good thing the whistleblowers did nothing of the sort.
-
No
-
No
-
Unknown as the whistleblowers Id is unknown.
Allan
Starting to smell fishy?? It has been smelling fishy and in fact is a continued attempt at a Coup.
An attempt to remove a president because they didn’t like the election results.
Banana Republic stuff.
1 Like
No, impeachment is completely constitutional process to remove federal officers.
You don’t think trump is guilty and should be removed we get that.
But impeachment is how you remove federal officials.
And it’s in the constitution.
The house has sole power in the impeachment process.
Read the constitution, whydontcha.
Allan
2 Likes
You have the very fist standard that has not been met.
Probable cause.
Let us know when you get there with some sort of evidence.
Probable cause in an impeachment case. Lol. It’s a political process.
No cause is needed. Probable or otherwise. Just articles of impeachment.
Allan
Who knows more or who thinks they know more?
