2127

With this report…I’m gonna eat some crow. FAUCI needs to be held responsible. He used china to as we have all been told…to circumvent the ban on Gain of Function Research put in place by the Obama admin.

Then he was a big part of covering up what he already knew. :roll_eyes:

Fauci should be in jail. He has in part or in whole disrupted the world.

8 Likes
2128

Is that a union job TC?

2129

Just so we’re clear, it wasn’t Trump’s fault?

2130

Im not going to say that. Im unclear as of right this minute when Fauci signed up for this with the chinese. But man…Fauci ■■■■■■ the world.

1 Like
2131

Were any of these correct?

  • lab leak as conspiracy
  • efficacy of lockdown
  • harmlessness of school closures
  • recovered immunity
  • toddler masking
  • vax mandates
3 Likes
2132

Yes sir.

2133

yes dog

2134

Ha! Hope you are getting yours

2135

Thank you for being straightforward.

1 Like
2136

I talked about this before in this thread. Usually with TNT. I used to do this but got tired of it after a while and finally showed them the card. But I made sure that I told them I was vaccinated. They forced me to get tested every week because I wouldn’t show them proof. So they can’t say I’ve been ripping them off.

2137

I always try to be agree or disagree. Im always gonna try to be straight. And i have no problem admitting i was wrong about Fauci.

2 Likes
2138

About those masks.

https://www.cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses

The pooled results of RCTs did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks. There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection. Hand hygiene is likely to modestly reduce the burden of respiratory illness, and although this effect was also present when ILI and laboratory-confirmed influenza were analysed separately, it was not found to be a significant difference for the latter two outcomes. Harms associated with physical interventions were under-investigated.

2139

CNBCs Brian sullivan is about to become a star

1 Like
2140
2141

You should quote the entire conclusion.

Authors’ conclusions:
The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions. There were additional RCTs during the pandemic related to physical interventions but a relative paucity given the importance of the question of masking and its relative effectiveness and the concomitant measures of mask adherence which would be highly relevant to the measurement of effectiveness, especially in the elderly and in young children.

There is uncertainty about the effects of face masks. The low to moderate certainty of evidence means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited, and that the true effect may be different from the observed estimate of the effect. The pooled results of RCTs did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks. There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection. Hand hygiene is likely to modestly reduce the burden of respiratory illness, and although this effect was also present when ILI and laboratory-confirmed influenza were analysed separately, it was not found to be a significant difference for the latter two outcomes. Harms associated with physical interventions were under-investigated.

There is a need for large, well-designed RCTs addressing the effectiveness of many of these interventions in multiple settings and populations, as well as the impact of adherence on effectiveness, especially in those most at risk of ARIs.

2142

“Give us mo’ money!”

2143

Didn’t change their conclusion, sorry. Says what it says, no evidence masks work against respiratory virus.

1 Like
2144

lol… why would he need to quote the orthodoxy requirement?

2145

Many people have a hard time admitting they got played.

2 Likes
2146

It says their study has low confidence and could very well be wrong.

Why is it so important to you to prove masks don’t work?