Among the other “sensible gun safety laws” we’re told we must pass and enforce to be “more like Europe” are mental health evaluations for all potential owners buyers.
Wait, isn’t there already something similar to that in place? I noticed that in some states, if you have a history of domestic violence or psychiatric hospital stays, you weren’t allowed to purchase a firearm.
The law proposed in the OP in which you would need a doctor to “approve” your mental state to own a fire-arm.
since owning a fire-arm is a right in America, it wouldn’t make sense because a person has rights inherit unless removed by Judaical, which would make the law a complete power grab and illegal.
Yes, Rights are inherit you don’t need clearance to use them you have them by default the government need to prove in court you shouldn’t have them you don’t need to prove that you should have them.
owning a firearm is a right in America like any other.
Well you’re making progress but no, it’s not a right like any other, it is specifically protected and comes with the highest level of protection mentioned anywhere in our constitution, “Shall Not Be Infringed”.
That prohibition on gov’t does not exist for any other right enumerated or otherwise.
Which can damage more lives? A citizen with a gun? Or a politician with the power to create laws? No mental health tests for gun owners before politician have to pass mental health tests to run for office.