The Reaction to Trump's Interruptions of biden Is Hilarious

[WuWei]

@JayJay

When the responsible person doesn’t do their job, it’s the accountable person’s head that’s at risk.

However Trump doesn’t believe that either.

No argument.

[Bodecea]

@Piper

@PAmoderate37

Do Trump supporters actually believe Trump is an honorable person? No wonder this country is so divided.

Is that a requirement for POTUS?

Well, there you have it…

[Bodecea]

@PAmoderate37

@Piper

Is that a requirement for POTUS?

Depends on the person voting.

Apparently.

[Bodecea]

@Sknyluv

@Guvnah

@Sknyluv

Not following the agreed upon debate rules was a “debate tactic”?

Do you think Trump was the only one who didn’t follow the rules?

He might have done it more than Biden, but both interrupted each other. Heck. Chris Wallace interrupted at times.

Defending Trump by saying that he had to interrupt is pretty insane. You’re basically admitting that Trump can’t win by the power of his arguments and needs to break the system. It’s such a pathetically low standard you have for Trump. I hold my three year old to higher standards.

I’ve been reading comments from parents who let their mid-range children watch the debates and wish they hadn’t…it was such a bad example on how an adult should behave…from the so-called President of the United States.

[sikofit]

@WuWei

But just Trump.

Yes. I see Biden as wanting a normal debate. Trump doesn’t

[WuWei]

Here’s a mistaken concept about accountability - that a person can be “held accountable” by someone else.

One holds one’s self accountable, it has to come from inside. It’s basically taking ownership of the process.

“Holding accountable” is actually holding responsible for another’s performance. That’s why being able to fire somebody is so important.

You can’t give somebody responsibility without authority, then try to “hold them accountable”.

Of course in politics, we throw all that out the window.

[JayJay]

Remember in 1992 when the conservatives’ slogan was that character mattered?

[Bodecea]

@FloridaYankee

@Piper

@PAmoderate37

Do Trump supporters actually believe Trump is an honorable person? No wonder this country is so divided.

Is that a requirement for POTUS?

Yes…

You’d think that would be self-explanatory…in America.

[WuWei]

@sikofit

@WuWei

But just Trump.

Yes. I see Biden as wanting a normal debate. Trump doesn’t

Too bad for Biden. Trump isn’t “normal”. You debate the enemy, not who you want to debate.

[WuWei]

@Bodecea

@FloridaYankee

@Piper

@PAmoderate37

Do Trump supporters actually believe Trump is an honorable person? No wonder this country is so divided.

Is that a requirement for POTUS?

Yes…

You’d think that would be self-explanatory…in America.

Hillary Clinton was “honorable”?

[sikofit]

@WuWei

@sikofit

@WuWei

But just Trump.

Yes. I see Biden as wanting a normal debate. Trump doesn’t

Too bad for Biden. Trump isn’t “normal”. You debate the enemy, not who you want to debate.

Which is why I said I don’t think Trump will agree. I also don’t think it will serve him any better in the 2nd debate than it did last night.

[Phaedrus]

C’mon man. It was a throwaway joke.

[Sknyluv]

@GWH

One would think that based on the back and forth in the “open discussion” segment leading up to that. But in my opinion, the format was changed by the moderator in the very next segment. Trump didn’t want to be railroaded, and went on the attack. Whether it served him well or not is another story.

Spoilers. It didnt.

[WuWei]

Jokes are only jokes when they are funny and rarely when they have to be explained.

[Phaedrus]

@Sknyluv

@GWH

One would think that based on the back and forth in the “open discussion” segment leading up to that. But in my opinion, the format was changed by the moderator in the very next segment. Trump didn’t want to be railroaded, and went on the attack. Whether it served him well or not is another story.

Spoilers. It didnt.

It kinda did. He baited Biden into either getting peevish, or allowing Trump to set the terms.

[Sknyluv]

@Phaedrus

@Sknyluv

@GWH

One would think that based on the back and forth in the “open discussion” segment leading up to that. But in my opinion, the format was changed by the moderator in the very next segment. Trump didn’t want to be railroaded, and went on the attack. Whether it served him well or not is another story.

Spoilers. It didnt.

It kinda did. He baited Biden into either getting peevish, or allowing Trump to set the terms.

And who exactly did this ingratiate to Trump? Moderates? Undecided voters? Clearly his base wants him to act like a troll, but … who else saw his behavior last night and thought, “Yep, that’s the person I want as President.”

[Phaedrus]

It’s not designed to ingratiate him with undecideds. It’s designed to make those people wonder whether Biden is as weak or senile as Republicans are painting him to be.

[GWH]

You’re right. A lot of people walked away from last night feeling sympathy for Joe after Trump made him look weak and ineffective. Good luck getting people to vote for weak and ineffective.

[Sknyluv]

@Phaedrus

It’s not designed to ingratiate him with undecideds. It’s designed to make those people wonder whether Biden is as weak or senile as Republicans are painting him to be.

It clearly didn’t do that.

[Sknyluv]

@GWH

You’re right. A lot of people walked away from last night feeling sympathy for Joe after Trump made him look weak and ineffective. Good luck getting people to vote for weak and ineffective.

I don’t think that happened either. Very little conversation today is about Biden’s performance. Which was fine, if not forgettable. It’s all about Trump being a bully during the debate. If Trump wanted to make Biden look weak and ineffective, he failed. Horribly.