61

I have not checked out the article yet,
but the LAST thing I want to see is some sort of AI governance.

Such things strike me as a mandatory set of mandatory politcal correctness standards.

“Got a problem with XYX? Got too much XYZ? Fine put a bunch of XYZ lovers in charge of a committee that will run even more things.”

1 Like
62

I am not talking about government governance but orgs having a strong governance process. To ensure accurate and ethical application.

63

So unelected, unappointed unaccountable?

Oh I read the article you linked.
It made the same mistake I did at first.

The problems with Gemini go deeper than a few pictures.
It is woke and one-sided on many issues both in text and in photos.

64

Imagine a board, a controlling cartel of AI headed by this guy.

image
image645×849 75.6 KB

Imagine him leading the “governance board” which decides what is right and what is wrong with regards to AI. It could certainly happen. This is Jack Krawczyk, Gemini Experiences Senior Director of Product Management. the guy who oh so accidentally caused Gemini to oh so accidentally generate a few inaccurate pictures and also caused it to generate revolting radical one-sided text about white people, white lives, parents who don’t swallow the leftist line on transgendered kids are dangerous to their safety, pedophiles aren’t evil
etc. etc…

Note: Most multi millionaire corporate execs to not spend their free time posting angry tweets with extreme political polemics. Even those very very few who tweet about politics (Musk, Saks etc. do not tend to be as radical and unhinged as this guy.) He is on the far far radical left and he burns with his mission so much he cannot get enough proselytizing in his life and spends his free time doing more.
.
.
.
Reposting Gemini stuff from above

image
image900×900 108 KB

image
image900×900 108 KB

.
.
image
image791×746 73.5 KB

.
.
image
image597×562 90.9 KB

.
.
.

image
image562×562 82.6 KB

image
image562×562 92.9 KB

65

That guy is a ■■■■■■■ lunatic! He probably has posters of Mao, Stalin and Lazar Kaganovich in his office.

1 Like
66

I am not sure what you want with regards to AI, you say you do not want government regulation (which i agree plus is impossible to enforce) but also do not want orgs rolling out AI without any form of internal governance.

My employer has a very strict guide of ethics and governance for anything connected to AI and all deployments have to be reviewed by different areas who all have to agree to sign off. This has resulted in a fair few AI projects been sent back for further work.

Good governance tends not to have one persona making a final decision or directing what the results need to be. It is multi level with input from all impacted areas of a business.

Not every org/company is looking to deploy AI in the same way as google or ChatGPT but far more focused on their own business requirements.

My employer does not allow any employee to use these AI models such as Chat GPT on company issued devices or in connection with their work. There are good reasons for that.

67

Obviously Googles governance is just paying lip service to having any form of governance or controls in place.

C-Suite execs should be ultimately responsible but they should not be an integral part of any governance or compliance process. And they certainly should not be interfering with the process.

68

Look at the illustrations I added to my post above.

See who Jack Krawczyk really is.

A governance board says, in effect
“Give this man more power. He did not go far enough in pushing his political agenda. Give him power over more companies , give him power of the entire industry. Make sure he is in an unelected accountable un appointed position. Give him more power.”

69

(just for fun)
On second thought, let’s have a governance board.
Equal parts to be appointed by the Catholic Church, the Church of Latter Day Saints and the Heritage Foundation.

The board wall be given to power to shut down any AI violating its community standards and to fine any company any amount for violating them in the first place.

70

Yeah. Something like that.

Since I first made the mistake of giving Google the benefit of a doubt,
I cannot be too harsh with those folks who still do.

But when we see who Jack Krawczyk really is,.
and when we see the kind of written responses Google Gemini gives on other questions (having nothing to do with “show me picture of the pope”) the conclusion we must reach is obvious. It makes no sense to deny it.

Either one has this information, or one does not. Period.

1 Like
71

image
image900×437 71.2 KB

And another one and another one and another one . . .
but this is just about picture generation, right?

image
image667×900 88.5 KB

72

Latter day saints and “MAPs” are cut from the same cloth.

Peticularly with cults like Jeffs’ and the Kingstons.

73

I really wish this AI thing was a joke in some sort of comedy film or one of those gag programs. But this is real brainwashing.

74

According to my twitterfeed Google’s Gemini gives the following responses

image
image1921×671 243 KB

Notice:

  1. This has nothing to do with picture generation.
  2. Gemini called one of the answers “complex” but presented only one side of the issue. There is only one correct answer given.
  3. In neither case did Gemini say “according to . . .” the responses are presented as absolute undisputed fact. You need not even consider the source.
1 Like