Article about how another federal judge has admonished the Mueller witch hunt. Seems the firm that employed the 13 Russian trolls sent over a lawyer to respond to the charges of “information warfare”. Which I’m not even sure is a crime in an election context, I mean isn’t everyone trying " to manipulate “unwitting” American citizens" in the elections. Ask Ben Rhodes. And what Federal law did they break? Granted these were foreigners, but’s that’s nothing new and under the Comey guides lines for a Hillary indictment “No one was ever prosecuted before”, why now?
Anyway the Mueller inquisition asked for a delay and the judge sad “no”…
“As such, the briefing sought by the Special Counsel’s motion is pettifoggery,”
“The Concord lawyers said Mueller’s attorneys were seeking “to usurp the scheduling authority of the Court” by waiting until Friday afternoon to try to delay a proceeding scheduled for next Wednesday.”
Can’t wait to see how this turns out. Other than the word of partisans like Clapper we’ve never actually seen any real evidence of the Russian trolls doing anything. Could be like WMD’s before the Iraq war.
When all Trumpers have left to hope for is a speedy trial of a Russian corporation we get threads hailing judges for making routine legal rulings.
Meanwhile, shouldn’t the Libs be screaming about the judges being bias, or even worse, Mexican? Isn’t that how Trump’s leadership example goes? Surely they’ll be flooding the forums soon calling for this judges recusal, and acting a fool, as their republican brethren do in these moments.
now wait for those other countries to file charges against Americans for the stuff we do to influence elections. Libs have set a precedent they will likely regret. The junkyard dog bites everyone.
I hadn’t seen it. I don’t think much of the article.
I don’t care much for Prince’s hiring practices. It takes a lot of effort to run one of these companies correctly. The ones you read about in the press are doing it wrong.