You are the one who brought race into the issue, as liberals reflexively do. You first pointed out the white percentages of Iowa and New Hampshire and said they were out of touch with the party. I asked you what does racism have to do with it. You brought up the percentage of white people in those states again. I suggested maybe it was the minorities that were racist against the white people in those states, that maybe they just didn’t want to move into states with all those white people.
AND THEN, you spoke some truth. You said those two states are primarily rural and people of color tend to live in cities. IOW, racism had nothing to do with it.
BUT THEN, you demonstrated your unrealized hypocrisy by saying " mainly because there are more opportunities."
Really??? You call white rural voters racists because apparently they don’t have many minorities in their communities, because of lack of opportunities ( which isn’t a factor of racism), you claim cities are full of opportunities that draw minority populations AND COMPLETELY IGNORE THE FACT THAT EVERY BIG CITY HAS MINORITY GHETTOS UTTERLY LACKING IN OPPORTUNITY AND HOPE, which is why they are gang infested, drug infested, crime infested hell holes full of minorities killing each other by the thousands. BTW, they’ve been under DEMOCRAT leadership for decades…
AND THEN, you say the states aren’t “racist” but the primary system disenfranchises minorities… I asked essentially how and asked why you guys rejected Harris and Booker, and pointed out the lack of diversity in your candidate pool. Your reply “Little known fact. Dems still elect white people!” REALLY???
So how come when conservatives and Republicans reject Obama, Booker and Harris it’s because we’re a bunch of racists?
With you guys it’s a meaningless, thoughtless, hypocritical reflex.
1 Like