4181

So, if we are being consistent with all the “Russia helped Trump” outrage, are you in for about three years of “Iran helped Harris”?
Should the Senate investigate and issue a report?

4182

So far no one is biting on printing the stolen emails.

The two examples before this were of Trump surrogates laundering stolen material into the mainstream… first with Roger Stone in contact with Russian Intelligence and coordinating with Wikileaks and DCLeaks and second with Guiliani and the soggy laptop.

So if anything that shady happens from the Harris campaign… yeah … then we can start to draw direct comparisons

1 Like
4183

Roger Stone,a Trump surrogate? Maybe in his own mind. Wikileaks did what it did and had nothing to do wit Stone.
And that laptop was not so,soggy after all. That was all Biden. The only corrupt thing there was the 51 lying ex intelligence agents interfering in our elections.

4184

Yes. He is a Trump surrogate. He was in 2016, he was in 2020, he continues to be one today.

He was the one that got hit by this supposed fishing attack. Now why would Roger Stone have emails if he isn’t working with the campaign?

There was DCleaks also and Stone was in direct contact with them because they were also Russian Intelligence.

I doubt it. macIsaacs story makes no sense but even so… still stolen.

And I knew the 51 officers thing would pop up.

Very funny.

4185

FBI documents reveal communication between Stone, Assange

I think you’re misremembering. Roger Stone, a confidant of President Donald Trump, reassured WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in a Twitter message that if prosecutors came after him, “I will bring down the entire house of cards,” according to FBI documents made public Tuesday.

1 Like
4186

Besides this nonsense above which is unsupported by facts, the fact remains that we were continually hit with “Russia is helping Trump” regardless of whether it was shown that Trump had any involvement (he did not). We can at least surely agree that there is at least as much evidence that Iran is helping Harris as there was that Russia was helping Trump.
What other purpose would Iran have?
So let the Senate hearings begin.

4187

That does not make Stone a representative of Trump. He may have imagined himself that. He was not. Your history lesson is well known but not relevant. “Confidant of Trump”. In your mind.

1 Like
4188

If the Harris campaign was actively seeking the help of Iran like the Trump campaign did with Russia in 2016… we would have a good comparison.

If Iran hacks Trump and no one accepts the data and the Harris campaign turns a blind eye to the existence of the hack… then we have a bad comparison

4189
4190

Accept it? It was put on Wikileaks. No one “accepted it” but Assange.

4191

From your article:

“Bannon, who testified in response to a subpoena, did not say anything about Trump and said Stone had not been sent by anyone on the campaign to talk to Assange.“

So desperate after all these years for it all to be true. Say, why not set up a special investigator?

4192

It’s true.
“Steve Bannon says Roger Stone was Trump campaign’s link to WikiLeaks”

4193

And yet no one ever sent him to contact Assange according to Bannon. Still ignoring that we had to listen to Russia was helping Trump for three years, even if Trump wasn’t involved.
Yet apparently Iran wants to help Harris. Why?

4194

If Harris has someone in a role analogous to Roger Stone’s in 2016, sure. But Trump is going to run with “Iran helped Harris!” regardless.

But what do you think is the right thing to do here, independent of partisan politics?

4195

He didn’t have to be sent. It’s all in the Stone/Assange emails.

4196

Assange posted those on his own. There is no evidence that Stone was doing anything but trying to insert himself as he was basically useless.

4197

And Stone was in contact Assange and Russian Intelligence about coordinating the release of the emails.

4198

Also, Roger Stone says Roger Stone was the link:

2 Likes
4199

Independent of partisan politics? The right thing to do is recognize the hypocrisy of wanting Irans hacking to be seen as independent of partisan politics while the Russia hoax ran on for years.

4200

I am in support of the organizations that are refusing to print the hacked information.

I certainly hope that they keep it up.