Or this lol

5 Likes

Trump can fart without having to lift his leg and strain.

That was from 3 years ago. Post a more recent one.

Cheap fake.

3 Likes

IMG_0530

5 Likes

You’re right! Can’t say I can find any other “stretching” photos. But he was riding his bike a few weeks ago.

1 Like

Not actually fake!

Look at this weak censor job.

This is so ridiculous.

Round 1 goes to Trump.

:rofl:

Censor
Never
News

2 Likes

CNN should have waited to show its hand THAT blatantly.

:rofl:

2 Likes

Oopsie.

Earlier this month, a Florida Court of Appeals granted a win to Young and Nemex when it found there was “sufficient preliminary evidentiary showing of actual malice” in CNN’s coverage of their work in Afghanistan.

The court’s decision succinctly summarized the background of the case: “On November 11, 2021, CNN’s ‘The Lead with Jake Tapper’ aired a video segment by reporter Alex Marquardt about Afghans attempting to flee the Taliban via private evacuation operators like Young. Over the next few days, Marquardt’s reporting was republished on another CNN program, disseminated on Facebook and Twitter, and repackaged into a digital article on CNN’s website.”

Young sued CNN for defamation and trade libel, arguing his reputation was damaged by the news station’s coverage. “Specifically, Young alleged CNN repeatedly accused him of operating in a ''black market" and mischaracterized his work as exploitative because he charged “exorbitant” fees Afghan citizens could not pay. Young claimed he was particularly harmed because he was the only private evacuator profiled in the reporting,” the decision reads.

The lawsuit showed internal communications from other CNN employees concerned that the story was “incomplete,” “a mess,” and not “fleshed out for digital.” Another criticism offered internally was that the “story is 80% emotion, 20% obscured fact,” according to the ruling.

2 Likes

What do YOU think a Cheap fake is?

:rofl:

Let’s Go Brandon!

IMG_0880

IMG_0881

2 Likes

Dude is so old.

Contrived
Narrative
Network

1 Like

Transitional President.

2 Likes

Where have I ever posted I was an expert? I said I had experience and knowledge yes but never an expert

I don’t assume anything, those picture ARE two year old and the evidence was in my post where I linked specifically where those pictures were used. The third one for example was an easy find because of which airline cancellations were named which narrowed down the where they operated . And the evidence is clear THOSE specific example you used where cancelation due to weather. Maybe make an extra effort?

See unlike you, I back what I say with proof , like I did with PADL.

But all that is besides the point because your response about a post on million of people flying is to post cancelation due to weather and blame the airline…that does not make any sense and is not relevant. WX will ALWAYS be a factor in delays and cancellations. Even more so in an area like NYC or FL where there are multiple Bravo airports in close proximity to each other and yet once again does not deal with the claim that

Are they though? Again posted if you had bothered to read less then 2% cancelation by airline for all operations in the past 2 years…98% completion rate that a small fraction not…“common”

Near disaster? One that is just being overly dramatic and fear mongering. The news will report a missed apprpach or a return at the gate because of mtx a near disaster. second how are airlines responsible for the "near disaster "? Gimmie specific example and I will becha that in 99% of the cases it’s either controls or crew either not following proper procedures or not using proper CRM. The southwest flight over will Roger is a perfect example…doing a visual approach late at night without having a approached loaded for SA is just stupid and yet there was no disaster because both ATC low alt warning and the GPWS syst alerted the crew. A missed was executed and a safe landing occured…the system worked. And that was 1flight out of 4000 that SWA does every single day.

So please lets talk about these so called disaster because that can be a hella lot of fun to dissect but… Yet again… Has absolutely NOTHING to do with trump stupidly claiming people are putting up tents…which you tried to defend by saying thousands are not. Hint: the near misses means the planes are movings

Yup and guess which admin is actually doing things to help passengers when airline screw up or try to fee the hell out of them? And yet passenger by large are not setting up tents inside terminals.

Again… What the hell does that have to do with the false claims that passengers are widescal setting tents in terminal?

Like I said… You demonstrate a continuous lack of knowledge on the subject and seem to react based on feelings vs facts and lots of personal attacks.

Someone pointed out a stupid statement made by the presumptive GOP nominee and you just HAVE to respond with no sequitur…why? Not everything he says need to be defended…

5 Likes

The enthusiasm for Trump is increasing and are you ready for this? The increase is due to what was already there…plus those that recognize the weaponization of our government run institutions plus… BDS.

“We” have had enough. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

3 Likes

Random thought of the day? :thinking:

What? Pretend that he’s a stork? Probably not. :wink:

3 Likes

That’s probably the only thing he remembers how to do. They say, once you learn to ride a bike you never forget, you know. :wink:

1 Like